Go back

"Single Sex Schools Offer No Advantages and Feed Stereotypes" (article)

Debates


Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Do you offer refunds?

You really should.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Although I agree that there may be no advantage to single sex schools and there may be disadvantages, she hasn't actually proven the disadvantages and its interesting that she used polling data to prove that educational outcomes are identical but didn't use the same data to prove her own claim.
Further her statement:
She was unavailable to comment to Guardian Australia but said in a statement the “underlying biology, physiology and social psychology of learning” was exactly the same across the sexes.

is false and suggests she isn't qualified to be talking about this sort of think anyway.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
an archaic system established solely on keeping groups segregated is not beneficial? shocking.

did those psychologists found that after deciding that physical punishment is not so good for children? will they conduct next a 2 year study on whether marital abuse leads to a healthy marriage or not?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
Although I agree that there may be no advantage to single sex schools and there may be disadvantages, she hasn't actually proven the disadvantages and its interesting that she used polling data to prove that educational outcomes are identical but didn't use the same data to prove her own claim.
Further her statement:
[quote]She was unavailable to commen ...[text shortened]... quote]
is false and suggests she isn't qualified to be talking about this sort of think anyway.
"she hasn't actually proven the disadvantages"
did she make a claim there were disadvantages? if not, why would she have to prove there were any?


Originally posted by Zahlanzi
did she make a claim there were disadvantages?
Did you bother to read the article before opening your big mouth?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
Did you bother to read the article before opening your big mouth?
no, i am asking you. i have no intention of bothering to read the article.


Originally posted by twhitehead
Did you bother to read the article before opening your big mouth?
"Z" only talks. Maybe he can't read.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
no, i am asking you. i have no intention of bothering to read the article.
Then try asking politely.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
no, i am asking you. i have no intention of bothering to read the article.
Then maybe read the headline, at least.

Hint: "Feed Stereotypes"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Then maybe read the headline, at least.

Hint: "Feed Stereotypes"
To be a Hillary supporter, it behooves him to not every read....anything ever again.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Even assuming there's no *net* advantage to the median student single sex schools, that doesn't mean that they're not advantageous to any students. It stands to reason that single sex settings could benefit some students while hurting others.

That's why, as always, giving parents (who know their own children best) the choice seems like the best idea.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Home schooling is a legitimate option.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.