Originally posted by @eladar
So would what I described be considered female raping a male?
So in your strange little scenario, we have girl and boy watching an erotic movie, and girl has an idea, and thinks to herself;
'I have an idea, I'll whip his trousers off sharpish before he realises what's going on, and jump on him.'
Am I right so far?
If so then my conjecture would be that one of two things would happen, either;
a. Boy would prefer to watch tele, doesn't much fancy girl anyway, or else goes into complete state of shock. Either way he loses state of arousal quicker than you can say 'state of arousal' and before his trousers have reached his knees, and no sexual union takes place, or;
b. Boy fancies girl and allows removal of said trousers and everything that follows thereafter, in which case it would be.....ready? SEDUCTION.
I maintain that when it comes to full - on sexual union, leaving aside other body parts, inanimate objects and sticking your finger in someone's ear, it is physically impossible for a woman to rape a man. You and others may disagree with me, which is fair enough, but I think I am entitled to my perception. Anyway compare your scenario to some meat - head taking a woman against her will and see how it compares; it isn't the same thing.
And there I leave it, as the subject becomes somewhat depressing, and I leave with a celebration of all the good love which happens between loving, consenting people.