Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 12 Oct '16 23:37 / 3 edits
    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bomb-clinton-camp-discussed-deleting-emails-despite-knowing-law/




    Gateway Pundit ^ | 10/12/2016 | Jim Hoft
    A new Wikileaks email revealed Hillary Clinton confidant Phillipe Reines discussed deleting emails despite knowing it was against the law. Clinton later deleted over 33,000 subpoenaed emails. HRC confidant P. Reines discusses strategies they can "use…as the excuse" for not turning over all her emails despite receiving a subpoena pic.twitter.com/ZzWapiienk — Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 12, 2016
  2. 12 Oct '16 23:39
    Does anyone care? Nope, cuz Trump is a pig.
  3. Subscriber mchill
    cryptogram
    12 Oct '16 23:57 / 2 edits
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bomb-clinton-camp-discussed-deleting-emails-despite-knowing-law/




    Gateway Pundit ^ | 10/12/2016 | Jim Hoft
    A new Wikileaks email revealed Hillary Clinton confidant Phillipe Reines discussed deleting emails despite knowing it was against the law. Clinton later deleted over 33,000 subpoenaed emails. H ...[text shortened]... ite receiving a subpoena pic.twitter.com/ZzWapiienk — Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 12, 2016
    I hope this not going to be another round of Whodey (Attorney at Law) interpreting legal statutes.
  4. 13 Oct '16 07:29 / 4 edits
    Originally posted by whodey
    Does anyone care? Nope, cuz Trump is a pig.
    You gotta realise that this is all they have, some 10 year old tape that no one cares about and here we have a smokin gun and proof of corruption and the main stream media could not care less. What does it tell you when we trust wikileaks more than the NYT and the FBI?

    your alternative media source is rather interesting though, 3 simple steps to get any woman to obsess over you? really? simple trick to make anyone your girlfriend? man that's desperate!
  5. 13 Oct '16 09:27
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    ... here we have a smokin gun and proof of corruption .....
    Really? Wild accusations by whodey is 'a smokin gun and proof of corruption'? You have really lost your sanity.
  6. 13 Oct '16 09:59
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Really? Wild accusations by whodey is 'a smokin gun and proof of corruption'? You have really lost your sanity.
    wild accusations by whodey? the smokin gun is a reference to the wikileaks content, please try to read, understand and assimilate the material prior to commenting.
  7. 13 Oct '16 10:17
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    wild accusations by whodey? the smokin gun is a reference to the wikileaks content, please try to read, understand and assimilate the material prior to commenting.
    And what was 'corruption' in reference to?
  8. 13 Oct '16 10:27
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    And what was 'corruption' in reference to?
    The corruption between Hillary's aides and the DOJ (department of justice)
  9. Standard member DeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    13 Oct '16 10:52
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bomb-clinton-camp-discussed-deleting-emails-despite-knowing-law/




    Gateway Pundit ^ | 10/12/2016 | Jim Hoft
    A new Wikileaks email revealed Hillary Clinton confidant Phillipe Reines discussed deleting emails despite knowing it was against the law. Clinton later deleted over 33,000 subpoenaed emails. H ...[text shortened]... ite receiving a subpoena pic.twitter.com/ZzWapiienk — Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 12, 2016
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/donald-trump-putins-puppet/2016/10/10/451f099e-8f0e-11e6-a6a3-d50061aa9fae_story.html?utm_term=.15c5d0ae94a5
  10. 13 Oct '16 11:03
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    The corruption between Hillary's aides and the DOJ (department of justice)
    Can you give more detail? What exactly was corrupt? In what way does whodeys reference support that?
  11. 13 Oct '16 12:00 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by mchill
    I hope this not going to be another round of Whodey (Attorney at Law) interpreting legal statutes.
    Very true. It takes Machiavellian asp like Marauder to explain away how someone who compromises top secret information can escape unfettered, and then top it off by insisting that Hillary never lied about it.
  12. 13 Oct '16 12:02 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    You gotta realise that this is all they have, some 10 year old tape that no one cares about and here we have a smokin gun and proof of corruption and the main stream media could not care less. What does it tell you when we trust wikileaks more than the NYT and the FBI?

    your alternative media source is rather interesting though, 3 simple steps to ...[text shortened]... n to obsess over you? really? simple trick to make anyone your girlfriend? man that's desperate!
    Well that is the rub. How do you get "credible" news sources that are on the George Soros payroll to reveal stories that would damage Hillary?
  13. Subscriber no1marauder
    It's Nice to Be Nice
    13 Oct '16 12:05
    Originally posted by whodey
    Very true. It takes Machiavellian asp like Marauder to explain away how someone who compromises top secret information can escape unfettered, and then top it off by insisting that Hillary never lied about it.
    And it takes a partisan shill to keep insisting that Hillary "gave away top secret information" without ever providing a scintilla of evidence that she actually did.
  14. 13 Oct '16 12:08
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    And it takes a partisan shill to keep insisting that Hillary "gave away top secret information" without ever providing a scintilla of evidence that she actually did.
    Merely compromising top secret information is a crime.

    To think that other countries who engage in routine hacking were unable to hack her private server is insane.
  15. 13 Oct '16 12:21
    Originally posted by whodey
    Merely compromising top secret information is a crime.
    Then accuse her of that. The fact that you constantly lie about what she did suggests you don't actually think that what she did is bad enough.

    To think that other countries who engage in routine hacking were unable to hack her private server is insane.
    And you know nothing whatsoever about IT security. The reality is that her private server could easily have been more secure than the government ones, especially if nobody knew about it at the time. Other countries would have mostly been targeting the government servers.