Go back
gun control

gun control

General

Vote Up
Vote Down
-8

After the recent shooting the dims and hollywierd are again calling for more gun control. BUT. Not a single one is willing to give up their weapons or armed bodyguards.

Vote Up
7
Vote Down
-2

If only the Democrats hadn't banned guns in Ohio and Texas. If bystanders had been allowed to own and carry guns, someone could have shot the shooters before they started and now everyone would still be alive.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-2
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-3

Guns will always be available to anyone who is determined to get them...illegally..."Show me the money".

🙁

Vote Up
Vote Down
-5

@fmf said
If only the Democrats hadn't banned guns in Ohio and Texas. If bystanders had been allowed to own and carry guns, someone could have shot the shooters before they started and now everyone would still be alive.
Everyone would still be alive is not quite an accurate statement in my opinion, but agreed less people would have died. Unfortunately this is the world we live in today.

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down

@great-big-stees said
Guns will always be available to anyone who is determined to get them...illegally..."Show me the money".

🙁
True, however if some person has a gun available and ample of ammounition they will certainly do more damage than if they don't.

Buying a gun illegally is fine for career criminals who will very seldom be committing mass shootings, having other things on their mind. (Making money)

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
If only the Democrats hadn't banned guns in Ohio and Texas. If bystanders had been allowed to own and carry guns, someone could have shot the shooters before they started and now everyone would still be alive.
I bet most did not get the sarcasm in your post.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

@very-rusty said
Everyone would still be alive is not quite an accurate statement in my opinion, but agreed less people would have died. Unfortunately this is the world we live in today.
Whoosh...

Vote Up
2
Vote Down
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@very-rusty said
Everyone would still be alive is not quite an accurate statement in my opinion, but agreed less people would have died. Unfortunately this is the world we live in today.

-VR
For Pete's sake Rusty, get that sarcasm detector fixed.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@fmf said
Whoosh...
No whoosh about it, you are living in a fantasy world if you think others could have stopped it if carrying guns, people still would been shot, perhaps not as many killed.
Wake up and smell the rosee. Make a little sense for a change.

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@ghost-of-a-duke said
For Pete's sake Rusty, get that sarcasm detector fixed.
It is hard to get sarcasm sometimes! 😉 :p

Easy with you though you make it very plain you're being sarcastic! 😉

-VR

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@very-rusty said
No whoosh about it, you are living in a fantasy world if you think others could have stopped it if carrying guns, people still would been shot, perhaps not as many killed.
Wake up and smell the rosee. Make a little sense for a change.

-VR
Collective sigh across the known universe.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Collective sigh across the known universe.
You may soon need some mental help goad! 😉

-VR

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@very-rusty said
You may soon need some mental help goad! 😉

-VR
FMFs post was dripping in beautiful sarcasm. How you missed that is beyond me. (And the many people who thumbed it up).

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.