Posers and Puzzles

Posers and Puzzles

  1. Standard memberTheMaster37
    Kupikupopo!
    Out of my mind
    Joined
    25 Oct '02
    Moves
    20443
    28 Oct '07 17:18
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    THAT I know: Complex numbers are inherently involved with alternating current and RF, you have to use complex #'s to solve problems in current flow and voltages, say on an RF open wire feedline for instance, the current sine wave and the voltage sin waves are not in sync and require complex #'s to solve the real energy exchange, absorption or emission of RF ...[text shortened]... ameters into Mathcad or other software pacs and don't have to do the math by hand any more.
    In quantummechanics it helps reduce the amount of calculating to be done.

    Complex exponents are way easier to deal with than a bunch of sines and cosines.
  2. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    28 Oct '07 17:20
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    In quantummechanics it helps reduce the amount of calculating to be done.

    Complex exponents are way easier to deal with than a bunch of sines and cosines.
    Not only that but in QM complex numbers are an essential part of theory. They are not just a recipe for quick calculus.
  3. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    28 Oct '07 17:32
    Thank you all for answering my question.

    I know complex numbers are used to simplify calculations. I electronics, in quantumphysics and field theory and perhaps a lot of other branches as well.

    If you in the equation m=m0/(1-sqrt(v^2/c^2)) set v=c then you divide by zero, thus, velocities with mass at the speed of light is forbidden. But if you set v .gt. c you get a imaginary component for the mass. The equation doesn't forbid velocities faster than light but the phycisists cannot interpret mass with a imaginary component.

    We haven't seen anything in nature with a complex number yet, but is it possible to have for instance a mass with a imaginary component? Is it provable that it is impossible? Or is it possible, not yet provable? Then, perhaps faster than light velocities really is possible?

    My teacher in physics says it is impossible, but he doesn't know why. On the other hand he thinks that dual time dimensions is impossible also, and not knowing why.
  4. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    28 Oct '07 18:062 edits
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    In quantummechanics it helps reduce the amount of calculating to be done.

    Complex exponents are way easier to deal with than a bunch of sines and cosines.
    Also, sines and cosines are, essentially, i's and e's.

    sinx=[e^(ix)-e^(-ix)]/2i, etc.

    I believe that the work of vectors can be, and originally were, done using i, j and k (that is, the complex numbers over 4 dimensions).

    EDIT: 4 dimensions, not 3.
  5. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    28 Oct '07 18:13
    Originally posted by genius
    I believe that the work of vectors can be, and originally were, done using i, j and k. That is, the complex numbers over 3 dimensions.
    No.This is just a notation to indicate to indicate the unit vectors aling the three axes. It has nothing to do with complex numbers. Some people use î, ^j and ^k to denote the unit vectors and others use ^x,^y,^z but that's all that is to it.
  6. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    28 Oct '07 18:21
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    No.This is just a notation to indicate to indicate the unit vectors aling the three axes. It has nothing to do with complex numbers. Some people use î, ^j and ^k to denote the unit vectors and others use ^x,^y,^z but that's all that is to it.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion
  7. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    28 Oct '07 18:35
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    I know complex numbers are used to simplify calculations. I electronics, in quantumphysics and field theory and perhaps a lot of other branches as well.

    If you in the equation m=m0/(1-sqrt(v^2/c^2)) set v=c then you divide by zero, thus, velocities with mass at the speed of light is forbidden. But if you set v .gt. c you get a imaginary component for t ...[text shortened]... n the other hand he thinks that dual time dimensions is impossible also, and not knowing why.
    In QM complex numbers arew more than just quickie ways to do the math. They are essential to it.

    As for the other question we have no answer as fpor right now. I think that some experiments were done to see if tachyons could be detected and I know that they are used in many theories but experimental facst we have none.

    Special relativity just says that if body starts we v
  8. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    28 Oct '07 18:45
    Originally posted by genius
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion
    Are you talking about this?: the vector form of a quaternion may also be used. This form assumes that \vec{A} \equiv A_x\mathbf i + A_y\mathbf j + A_z\mathbf k. in that case the i,j,k are a notation to indicate the three coordinate axes and to explain how quaternions can be represented in that way. But don't you confuse a representation of an object with the object itself. Mathematical objects can have very representations.

    But I think that if you read the informal introduction, and bare in mind the word informal, you can see that.
  9. Standard membersmw6869
    Granny
    Parts Unknown
    Joined
    19 Jan '07
    Moves
    73127
    29 Oct '07 00:08
    Gracious sakes alive gentlemen....Granny is getting the vapors just listening to all this math lingo. Could anyone please explain it to Granny, in simple English... Is there a sq. root of minus 1 or not, and what is the simple answer ?

    Granny
  10. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    No1GaveAF*IWasWhite
    tinyurl.com/y3czz7bk
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    29 Oct '07 03:47
    Originally posted by smw6869
    Gracious sakes alive gentlemen....Granny is getting the vapors just listening to all this math lingo. Could anyone please explain it to Granny, in simple English... Is there a sq. root of minus 1 or not, and what is the simple answer ?

    Granny
    Yes.
  11. Standard membersmw6869
    Granny
    Parts Unknown
    Joined
    19 Jan '07
    Moves
    73127
    29 Oct '07 04:01
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Yes.
    Dear god, you have left Granny hanging. Please, what IS the sq. root of minus one? Granny will promote you to 10^4 for the answer.

    Granny.
  12. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    No1GaveAF*IWasWhite
    tinyurl.com/y3czz7bk
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    29 Oct '07 04:47
    Originally posted by smw6869
    Dear god, you have left Granny hanging. Please, what IS the sq. root of minus one? Granny will promote you to 10^4 for the answer.

    Granny.
    i
  13. Standard membersmw6869
    Granny
    Parts Unknown
    Joined
    19 Jan '07
    Moves
    73127
    29 Oct '07 15:14
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    i
    i ???....So YOU are the sq root of minus one?

    Granny.
  14. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    29 Oct '07 17:45
    Originally posted by smw6869
    i ???....So YOU are the sq root of minus one?

    Granny.
    Don't be such a square.
  15. Standard membersmw6869
    Granny
    Parts Unknown
    Joined
    19 Jan '07
    Moves
    73127
    29 Oct '07 21:03
    Originally posted by Palynka
    Don't be such a square.
    So, i x i = -1 ?

    Now it all makes sense!

    G.
Back to Top