1. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    05 Nov '07 12:45
    Correct - rather nice I think.
  2. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    05 Nov '07 14:21
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    Correct - rather nice I think.
    I don't think it's as nice as the other result. After all, with i^i you have an answer that isn't complex so, in that sense, I find it an elegant result.

    Of course, "nice" is not a mathematical term. 🙂
  3. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    05 Nov '07 15:56
    Originally posted by Palynka
    I don't think it's as nice as the other result. After all, with i^i you have an answer that isn't complex so, in that sense, I find it an elegant result.

    Of course, "nice" is not a mathematical term. 🙂
    What is nicer, n!=1x2x...xn or sqrt(2*Pi*n)*((n^n)/(e^n))?
  4. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    05 Nov '07 17:13
    Originally posted by genius
    What is nicer, n!=1x2x...xn or sqrt(2*Pi*n)*((n^n)/(e^n))?
    What does that have to do with anything?

    The answer to this second problem requires an expression that depends on i, while the first one has an answer defined in Real numbers. That's the difference.

    +-(1 + i)/sqrt(2) doesn't seem much different than leaving it as sqrt(i).
  5. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    05 Nov '07 17:18
    Originally posted by Palynka
    What does that have to do with anything?

    The answer to this second problem requires an expression that depends on i, while the first one has an answer defined in Real numbers. That's the difference.

    +-(1 + i)/sqrt(2) doesn't seem much different than leaving it as sqrt(i).
    the first looks nice, visually, while the second is much easier to see the value churned out, and easier to work with. They are approximatly equal, for large n.
  6. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    05 Nov '07 17:20
    Originally posted by genius
    the first looks nice, visually, while the second is much easier to see the value churned out, and easier to work with. They are approximatly equal, for large n.
    I'm sorry, but I still don't understand what your point is...
  7. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    06 Nov '07 10:01
    Originally posted by Palynka
    I'm sorry, but I still don't understand what your point is...
    Eessentially, that "nice" isn't a mathematical term...
  8. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    06 Nov '07 10:07
    Originally posted by genius
    Eessentially, that "nice" isn't a mathematical term...
    No, but I think there is beauty in some mathematical results. And beauty is not a mathematical term, either.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree