1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 Mar '21 15:20
    https://phys.org/news/2021-01-optical-sub-picosecond.html

    So say it is 1/10th of a picosecond, that would be 10 TRILLION operations per second.
  2. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    654980
    02 Mar '21 15:48
    @sonhouse said
    https://phys.org/news/2021-01-optical-sub-picosecond.html

    So say it is 1/10th of a picosecond, that would be 10 TRILLION operations per second.
    While this is really impressive, don't hold your breath to see see it on the market… As I understand the paper the setup is very special to find out the switching time for the single device.

    So challenges are:
    * reproduce the result
    * find out how to make an actual working device from it.
    * characterize that one.
    * find out how to make a complex device without losing the advantage
    * characterize that one
    * find a way to mass produce devices.
    * show that to investors
    * go for mass production.

    In my opinion we suffer in science from having to beat our drum, and to project far into a future to find the "breakthrough".

    The research is great in finding an ultrafast switch and being able to characterize it. An application in computing is very far away.
  3. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9548
    02 Mar '21 22:34
    @ponderable said
    While this is really impressive, don't hold your breath to see see it on the market… As I understand the paper the setup is very special to find out the switching time for the single device.

    So challenges are:
    * reproduce the result
    * find out how to make an actual working device from it.
    * characterize that one.
    * find out how to make a complex device without losin ...[text shortened]... an ultrafast switch and being able to characterize it. An application in computing is very far away.
    If it's anywhere comparable to cancer drug R & D it'll be at least 10 years.
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 Mar '21 15:073 edits
    @wildgrass
    When the engineering is done and they have a viable product, it sounds to me like it would make for a supercomputer in the size of a sound bar.

    Another path to small supercomputers: "Wafer scale processors"
    1.2 TRILLION transistors on one wafer, a bunch of parallel processors all on one 12 inch wafer.
    This technique has been tried for 40 years but just recently succeeded because of the problem of defects spoiling the mix.

    https://cerebras.net/wafer-scale-processors-the-time-has-come/
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree