1. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    20 Apr '20 20:232 edits
    https://phys.org/news/2020-04-astronomers-planet.html

    "...what was heralded as one of the first exoplanets to ever be discovered with direct imaging likely never existed.
    ...Two University of Arizona astronomers conclude that NASA's Hubble Space Telescope was instead looking at an expanding cloud of very fine dust particles from two icy bodies that smashed into each other.
    ...These collisions are exceedingly rare
    ...the final nail in the coffin came when their data analysis of Hubble images taken in 2014 showed the object had vanished, to their disbelief...."

    Oh well. You cannot get it right every time.
  2. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    26 Apr '20 01:29
    @humy said
    https://phys.org/news/2020-04-astronomers-planet.html

    "...what was heralded as one of the first exoplanets to ever be discovered with direct imaging likely never existed.
    ...Two University of Arizona astronomers conclude that NASA's Hubble Space Telescope was instead looking at an expanding cloud of very fine dust particles from two icy bodies that smashed into each other. ...[text shortened]... wed the object had vanished, to their disbelief...."

    Oh well. You cannot get it right every time.
    There's another 3,000+ to be investigated though!
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    27 Apr '20 03:41
    @wolfgang59
    Gonna be a lot more when the Webb scope gets up.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree