Clan Requirements

I have been thinking of making a suggestion that 1 man clans should not be allowed. Have a certain number that a clan must have to be a clan. That can be decided by the majority.

Originally posted by @very-rusty
I have been thinking of making a suggestion that 1 man clans should not be allowed. Have a certain number that a clan must have to be a clan. That can be decided by the majority.

Try thinking about something else... 😛

Originally posted by @very-rusty
I have been thinking of making a suggestion that 1 man clans should not be allowed. Have a certain number that a clan must have to be a clan. That can be decided by the majority.

I think your motive is based on personal reasons
you don't think things out very well

Originally posted by @lemondrop
I think your motive is based on personal reasons
you don't think things out very well

Explain to me how one man can be considered a clan if you can?

-VR

Originally posted by @very-rusty
Explain to me how one man can be considered a clan if you can?

-VR

every clan starts out as a one man clan
you just seem to go small all the time
RHP should welcome the start of any and all clans

Originally posted by @lemondrop
every clan starts out as a one man clan
you just seem to go small all the time
RHP should welcome the start of any and all clans

You maiden gertrude have a habit of booting people out of your clan or they just leave. IF a rule was made that X amount of people be required to make up a clan that would stop you from being able to do that!!!

-VR

The suggested process is quite unclear...

SoI assume, that you would allow a freshly founded clantohaveasingle member. At the point where a second memnber was recruited you wouldnot allow this one to leave?

Originally posted by @lemondrop
I think your motive is based on personal reasons
you don't think things out very well

Hmmmm.
Reminds me of Carrobie's push to redo the clan feature.

Originally posted by @very-rusty
I have been thinking of making a suggestion that 1 man clans should not be allowed. Have a certain number that a clan must have to be a clan. That can be decided by the majority.

Yeah I agree with you there brother. One man clans are a joke. There is one particular one man clan that takes advantage of the fact that a point (at least) is awarded for every game he/she (bit of both I think) wins. If it wins at least one of the two games in the challenge it is guaranteed at least one point. A total joke.

Drawn challenges need to result in nil points. This would close the loophole this current player/clan is abusing.

Either one man clans need to recruit a player before they play and the minimum challenge is two players or drawn challenges need to be awarded zero points. One or the other has to occur to clean up this loophole..

Originally posted by @radioactive69
Yeah I agree with you there brother. One man clans are a joke. There is one particular one man clan that takes advantage of the fact that a point (at least) is awarded for every game he/she (bit of both I think) wins. If it wins at least one of the two games in the challenge it is guaranteed at least one point. A total joke.

Drawn challenges need t ...[text shortened]... lenges need to be awarded zero points. One or the other has to occur to clean up this loophole..

Can't argue there.

Originally posted by @radioactive69
Yeah I agree with you there brother. One man clans are a joke. There is one particular one man clan that takes advantage of the fact that a point (at least) is awarded for every game he/she (bit of both I think) wins. If it wins at least one of the two games in the challenge it is guaranteed at least one point. A total joke.

Drawn challenges need t ...[text shortened]... lenges need to be awarded zero points. One or the other has to occur to clean up this loophole..

The whole clan system needs looking at
When any challenge is concluded when only 51% of the games are played is a joke
The current system encourages sandbagging when you can dump games without affecting the result
It also promotes the idea of one man challenges

Originally posted by @padger
The whole clan system needs looking at
When any challenge is concluded when only 51% of the games are played is a joke
The current system encourages sandbagging when you can dump games without affecting the result
It also promotes the idea of one man challenges

How many clans does Lemondrop have on the go presently?

-VR

Originally posted by @very-rusty
How many clans does Lemondrop have on the go presently?

-VR

At the moment none
Never the less he came third last year by not incurring the negative points
I see there is no mention of the current system promoting sandbagging
Whether a challenge is won or lost by half way
Games can still be dumped

Originally posted by @padger
At the moment none
Never the less he came third last year by not incurring the negative points
I see there is no mention of the current system promoting sandbagging
Whether a challenge is won or lost by half way
Games can still be dumped

The way it is now, you can only have so many challenges on going. So if you have won one best to just move on. It was made that way because of collusion going on between 4 teams. Now all have to suffer for their sins.

-VR