Originally posted by powershaker
So, how does that change the fact that there are "seven mothers' mentioned in the scriptures and they found seven mothers in the bloodline of 6,000 different European descendants? Didn't God take them by "sevens" according to the Noah story? Hello! Praise Jesus!
Look at the dates and compare with the knowledge you have about the bible. If you're going to use scientific data to "prove" the bible correct, you must also accept scientific data that "disproves" the bible. Otherwise you're only relying on make-believe, which is certainly not enough to go about calling people stupid for not believing what you do.
The bible says that the first man was Adam and the first woman was Eve. The bible also goes to great lenghts (tedious reading by the way) describing how everyone is descendants of those two (including your seven mothers). But science shows that all humans of today in one way or another descend from the bush people of the kalahari (120,000 or so years ago -
way before those seven mothers of yours).
Care to fit
that into the bible?
[Edit]
I'd just like to add that I'm not trying to make you disbelieve the bible. Even if the bible can't be taken literally, there's still the possibility that most of it is true on a
human level. Read the bible as consisting of stories to help you understand the message of God - the word of God, if you will, and it can still hold great value to you. You don't have to prove that everything in the bible is consistent with the physical reality and history of mankind. The details are unimportant. It's the
message that should matter to anyone who believes. This is the very definition of a believer. You don't know. You believe. And the bible is a book you use to guide you in spiritual matters.