12 Mar '08 16:15>1 edit
Originally posted by ZahlanziOk this is interesting.
here is my explanation.
i am a christian when it comes to jesus being the saviour and all and believing in the general message of the bible(be nice to God and to each other). anything else in the bible i believe only applies to that particular society(eg woman is an inferior being,noah's flood and the genesis).
so we consider a supreme being(one that he created us if we end up in heaven or hell. so he is not a sadist. (maybe just a little 😀)
You've gone with the humans are simply the amusment of a bored God. This is fair enough, I don't know if every Christian I know would agree that God is quite so trivial, but if there was a God, I certainly couldn't think of any other reason.
More interesting is your ideas about the omniscience of God. I have never heard this idea from a Christian before. Most of them would say, 'we have free will to make a choice, but God knows what we are going to choise.' If this was true then God would know what branch you'd end up on, and he would know exactly where you'd find your imortal soul. He would know which of his children would be hell bound before he creates them.
Now if we take your varient on Chritianity. If God does not know where people will end up before he creates them then he is left with an ethical dilema. He cannot vet his creations and only create those that will spend an eternity in bliss. Not creating someone has no negative effect on them because they would never know any better, so really the potentially saved people are irrelivant in this argument, and God should have created no one to avoid the possibility of anyone ending up in hell.
A totally different point: What do you think it says for the credibility of Christianity when you have such varing interpretations, such as your own? There does not seem to be any continuity at all, just a huge bunch of 'what I feel most comfortable with' ideas.