1. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    24 Jul '06 21:43
    Originally posted by Starrman
    I'm a hard @ss when it comes to being critical of other people's posts, I like to think that as a judge I would be more a Paedrus' knife, than a descriptive spatula. My background is a private classical educationan HND in zoology, currently doing a degree in philosophy, weak atheist and I hold a physicalist view of the world. Strangely enough I am also a c ...[text shortened]... will make me a useful addition to the judges panel, thus it is that I volunteer my services.
    I am the walrus; cu-cu-cuckchew.
  2. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    24 Jul '06 22:10
    Originally posted by EcstremeVenom
    oh, that was kinda the topic i wanted to debate lol
    Then presumably you want to debate me, as a person, on my personal disbelief in god? If so, that is fine, provided it is made clear that I am debating as an individual, on my right, and my decision to be an atheist.
  3. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    25 Jul '06 05:25
    I volunteered to judge earlier; why isn't my post there?
  4. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    25 Jul '06 05:43
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    I volunteered to judge earlier; why isn't my post there?
    Obviously someone didn't like it. (not me, btw)
  5. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    26 Jul '06 05:33
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Obviously someone didn't like it. (not me, btw)
    Clearly. Whatevs, I'd still like to judge.
  6. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    26 Jul '06 05:37
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    Clearly. Whatevs, I'd still like to judge.
    Sounds good.

    I suggest for judges, Royalchicken, Umbridge, DocS, Kelly and Hal? If any of these are unwilling, Starrman also wishes to be a judge. (Sorry starrman, I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    Now for a topic?! Perhaps our judges could facilitate that?
  7. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157807
    26 Jul '06 06:06
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Sounds good.

    I suggest for judges, Royalchicken, Umbridge, DocS, Kelly and Hal? If any of these are unwilling, Starrman also wishes to be a judge. (Sorry starrman, I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    Now for a topic?! Perhaps our judges could facilitate that?
    I suggest we use the methods we use at my house to pick a movie
    to watch. One suggest 3 or 4 they want to watch another selects from
    those choices. If none are selected, the one who said they were not
    good enough picks 3 or 4 until a choice is agreed upon, this normally
    causes everyone to find some happy ground with their picks. After all
    it is you two who are debating so what would you prefer to debate?
    Kelly
  8. Joined
    19 Nov '03
    Moves
    31382
    26 Jul '06 08:20
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Sounds good.

    I suggest for judges, Royalchicken, Umbridge, DocS, Kelly and Hal? If any of these are unwilling, Starrman also wishes to be a judge. (Sorry starrman, I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    Now for a topic?! Perhaps our judges could facilitate that?
    No probs, I'll stay on standby.
  9. Standard memberHalitose
    I stink, ergo I am
    On the rebound
    Joined
    14 Jul '05
    Moves
    4464
    26 Jul '06 08:451 edit
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Sounds good.

    I suggest for judges, Royalchicken, Umbridge, DocS, Kelly and Hal? If any of these are unwilling, Starrman also wishes to be a judge. (Sorry starrman, I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    Now for a topic?! Perhaps our judges could facilitate that?
    I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    How about having one agnostic on the panel?

    Edit: or a gnostic?
  10. Joined
    19 Nov '03
    Moves
    31382
    26 Jul '06 08:49
    Originally posted by Halitose
    [b]I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    How about having one agnostic on the panel?[/b]
    Do we have any?
  11. Standard memberHalitose
    I stink, ergo I am
    On the rebound
    Joined
    14 Jul '05
    Moves
    4464
    26 Jul '06 08:53
    Originally posted by Starrman
    Do we have any?
    When I last checked, No1 was an agnostic. I believe he's started leaning towards Taoism.

    Maybe we can get one to stick their heads out of the ground. 😀
  12. Standard memberDavid C
    Flamenco Sketches
    Spain, in spirit
    Joined
    09 Sep '04
    Moves
    59422
    26 Jul '06 15:00
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Now for a topic?! Perhaps our judges could facilitate that?
    Jessica Alba: Hot or Not?
  13. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    26 Jul '06 20:45
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Sounds good.

    I suggest for judges, Royalchicken, Umbridge, DocS, Kelly and Hal? If any of these are unwilling, Starrman also wishes to be a judge. (Sorry starrman, I want to try and keep the atheist / theist balance about 50:50).

    Now for a topic?! Perhaps our judges could facilitate that?
    Has DocS ever actually made any actual claims about the existence of god; ie, is he the neutral one?
  14. Joined
    19 Nov '03
    Moves
    31382
    26 Jul '06 21:071 edit
    Originally posted by David C
    Jessica Alba: Hot or Not?
    Hot

    EDIT: Where's the debate here?
  15. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    26 Jul '06 22:00
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    Has DocS ever actually made any actual claims about the existence of god; ie, is he the neutral one?
    Not sure, perhaps the good doctor can give us his thoughts, although I would trust all judges to try their best to be impartial.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree