I've been challenged to a debate on science by Royaltystatement. We'll use a standard debating style, similar to those used by DoctorScribbles in the debates forum. Once a choice of topic has been decided, and suitable judges appointed, we'll have three posts (although multiple posts are allowed if the text won't fit in one) each, and the winner voted on by the judges.
Royaltystatement, I propose we debate "Biblical creationism vs. Science". I propose we have a fair, unbiased jedge set. For this reason, I propose 5 judges. My choices for these judges would be; KellyJay, Halitose, UmbridgeofSnow and Telerion. These judges (should they accept) will, between them, appoint a fifth judge. This should prevent unnecesary bias by either of us.
I've been challenged to a debate on science by Royaltystatement. We'll use a standard debating style, similar to those used by DoctorScribbles in the debates forum. Once a choice of topic has been decided, and suitable judges appointed, we'll have three posts (although multiple posts are allowed if the text won't fit in one) each, and t ...[text shortened]... This should prevent unnecesary bias by either of us.
Do you accept, Royaltystatement?
this debate is one sided, clearly one is much smarter than the other though i will not say who lol
I've been challenged to a debate on science by Royaltystatement. We'll use a standard debating style, similar to those used by DoctorScribbles in the debates forum. Once a choice of topic has been decided, and suitable judges appointed, we'll have three posts (although multiple posts are allowed if the text won't fit in one) each, and t ...[text shortened]... This should prevent unnecesary bias by either of us.
Originally posted by EcstremeVenom this debate is one sided, clearly one is much smarter than the other though i will not say who lol
You weren't even worthy to be selected judge. And you cannot create a proper insult about me.
If it is your wish to insult me you may do so.
But it only reflects the fact that my intellect surpasses yours.
Originally posted by royaltystatement You weren't even worthy to be selected judge. And you cannot create a proper insult about me.
If it is your wish to insult me you may do so.
But it only reflects the fact that my intellect surpasses yours.
who said i was talking about you? thats hypocritical calling yourself intellectual and then assuming im calling you dumb.
Originally posted by scottishinnz Not until we have judges, and formalised rules of debate it hasn't.
I have PM'd the proposed judges. Are my suggestions okay with you, or would you like to suggest another two christian and two non-christian judges?
Have you read my comment?
Pick whatever judges you desire, I donot object.
Win or........ I will remain with GOD and the Christ and I doubt that you will seek repentance.
I understand this and know that because of who you are and because of who I am, we will NEVER agree where matters of religion, philosophy, of the creation of life are concerned. I am only willing to entertain this debate to silence to voices of blasphemy.
Choose as you wish, I am here. Though it is pointless to.
I am here.
Originally posted by royaltystatement You weren't even worthy to be selected judge. And you cannot create a proper insult about me.
If it is your wish to insult me you may do so.
But it only reflects the fact that my intellect surpasses yours.
Judges do not get involved in the debate. I asked the individuals noted to be judges because, whilst I do not always agree with them (Huh, Kelly!), they are representative of the "spirituality" group. I could have asked many others, such as FreakyKBH, googlefudge, Ecstremevenom, SpiritM8ageress, Nordly (who would be my choice for 5th judge, incidentally) etc. It's not based on "worthyness", quite whatever that is.
Originally posted by EcstremeVenom who said i was talking about you? thats hypocritical calling yourself intellectual and then assuming im calling you dumb.
Don't try to validate yourself or your actions. I know your words. And by your opposition to me I know your mind. Try to fool the narrowminded, not the wise.
Originally posted by scottishinnz Judges do not get involved in the debate. I asked the individuals noted to be judges because, whilst I do not always agree with them (Huh, Kelly!), they are representative of the "spirituality" group. I could have asked many others, such as FreakyKBH, googlefudge, Ecstremevenom, SpiritM8ageress, Nordly (who would be my choice for 5th judge, incidental ...[text shortened]... ased on "worthyness", quite whatever that is.
Others are free to post here as they will.
My post was not to you it was to he who attempted to disguise his insult.
DEBATE; Royaltystatement vs. ScottishinNZ
23 Jul '06 23:09
Back to Top