-Removed-Originally posted by divegeester
No, you asked suzi to take the topic of "annihilation" to another thread, I said you were wrong to do so because it's relevant to this thread, and now you are defending your position by showing that it was you who brought the topic up in the first place. Are you confused?
Originally posted by Suzianne
Since I consider myself perhaps one of the more vocal proponents of Annihilationism, consider this post only my first salvo in what may become an interesting conversation, and hopefully not just a "my opinion is obviously correct, and be quiet and learn" moment for you.
Sure, Suzi. May I suggest that you consider opening the topic of "Annihilationism"
up to a wider audience by giving it thread status of its own. I'll contribute.
.... suggested for the benefit of fresh eyes on the topic, not "asked".
-Removed-Originally posted by divegeester
Makes no sense in terms of my question. Don't worry let's let this piece pass and focus on why you think it is acceptable to burn people in an incinerator for eternity because they don't love you.
"why you think it is acceptable to burn people in an incinerator for eternity because they don't love you"
confuses the identity of yours truly with God Almighty and the human response of "love" with faith.
Thanks for the conversation. Good night....
-Removed-Tell me this, from your understanding of Grampy Bobby's claims about "unbelievers" suffering in "eternal excruciating agony", does this 'fate' also apply to "believers" who do believe in Jesus but don't believe in the "suffering in eternal excruciating agony" thing?
-Removed-Again tell me what you think, from your understanding of Grampy Bobby's "unbelievers" suffering in "eternal excruciating agony" thing.
If my wife ~ after a lifetime of Christian belief and deeds ~ became an "unbeliever" while losing a battle with terminal cancer, would I ~ outliving her ~ have to accept every moment of my remaining days that she was not dead, as such, but was instead "suffering in eternal excruciating agony" ~ and that this was "Justice and Righteousness a.k.a. Divine Integrity"?
-Removed-When corporate Christianity added Revelation to the canon under dubious circumstances three or four hundred years after Jesus' death they were certainly equipping themselves with a whole set of smoke & mirror tools for browbeating, bamboozling and scaring the flock. [You don't need to agree with me that that was what they did].