I Love Lucy

Originally posted by RJHinds
I think he meant Modus Operandi or MO.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/modus%20operandi

The Instructor

Thank you RJ

Originally posted by RJHinds
And maybe it is just another hoax. Yeah, that's it. Problem solved.

The Instructor

But the video does not say its a hoax - he is just disputing that she stood on two legs.

That is what is being discussed.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
But the video does not say its a hoax - he is just disputing that she stood on two legs.

That is what is being discussed.

Yeah, and it hung from the tree limbs like the other monkeys.

The Instructor

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Lets pretend that the pelvis is as he suggests.
By his own arguments Lucy would not be able to walk upright.
So how does he explain all the other features which point to bipedalism?
(I think the strongest is the curved spine)
??????????????????????????????????????

AND FINALLY
Not everyone is convinced Lucy is our ancestor anyway -
could be a dead-end. An extinct cousin.

Wasn't Lucy an Australopithecus afarensis?

Of course they're extinct. Been so for 2 million years now, when one of the Australopithecus species evolved into the Homo genus. But you are correct in that they now think that some Homo genus fossils have been found that are older than A. afarensis, so it may be another of the many Australopithecus species with the Homo lineage.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Wasn't Lucy an Australopithecus afarensis?

Of course they're extinct. Been so for 2 million years now, when one of the Australopithecus species evolved into the Homo genus. But you are correct in that they now think that some Homo genus fossils have been found that are older than A. afarensis, so it may be another of the many Australopithecus species with the Homo lineage.

It is obvious you don't know what you are talking about.

The Instructor

Originally posted by galveston75
So predictable with the attacks to make you evolutionist look so superior.
So yes I'm not as educated as you high and mighties are and I'm not ashamed of it.
But I know in the Bible God assures that he is not impressed with the knowlegde of man "at all" as "it is foolishness with him and compared to him" and their bragging of it but he is looking fo ...[text shortened]... elf look so juvenile by saying foolish syatements as you just did. It does not help your case...

If d attak was so predictible wy dident yoo bovver too lern how too spel d wird corectley in d ferst plase?

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is obvious you don't know what you are talking about.

The Instructor

Funny, I was thinking that about you.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Funny, I was thinking that about you.

A mutual admiration society?

The Instructor

Originally posted by Suzianne
Wasn't Lucy an Australopithecus afarensis?

Of course they're extinct. Been so for 2 million years now, when one of the Australopithecus species evolved into the Homo genus. But you are correct in that they now think that some Homo genus fossils have been found that are older than A. afarensis, so it may be another of the many Australopithecus species with the Homo lineage.

By extinct cousin I meant an extinct branch rather than an ancestor.

I should have been clearer.

Originally posted by sonship
More on Lucy, anyone?

Sonship, I think the ball is in your court.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
By extinct cousin I meant an extinct branch rather than an ancestor.

I should have been clearer.

Quite right about the extinct branch.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Quite right about the extinct branch.

More like a dead monkey.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
More like a dead monkey.

The Instructor

You do not even know what a monkey is!

And Sonship, after posting the rubbish he cant defend it.

Another loss for the creationists.