Originally posted by @kellyjay
You are of the opinion that we haven't seen an event at such a large scale therefore it
could not have happen on a large scale? Islands grow, the earth can and does change,
people have just bought into the GC was carved out by time they don't even think it could
have happen another way, it could have formed that way for all we know along with the
rest of the planet.
Yes, it
does matter whether humans have ever seen an event on such a scale, if, as you apparently believe, the history of the universe is co-temporaneous with human history (give or take 5 days).
You repeatedly ask 'how do you know?'; we repeatedly point out facts which are extremely well-established and throughly researched based on a some law of nature or other well-documented natural process or mechanism; you repeatedly say 'you still don't know, it could have happened some other way.' But you don't have a plausible alternative explanation how these things could have happened or how anyone could know that these things could happen in the manner which you seem to think they did. 'Goddidit' is not an explanation; it is a confession of intellectual defeat. If an explanation is to explain anything, then it must be
less mysterious than what it explains. God is the most mysterious thing of all. To say 'Godiddit' is to explain the mysterious by an even greater mystery.
If, as you apparently believe, the history of the universe is roughly co-temporaneous with human history (give or take 5 days), then Adam popped into a garden in which the trees were already full-grown; that is, they had tree rings inside them 50 or maybe 100 years old. But there
were no 50 or a 100 years before that, because God had just created it all. If, as you apparently believe, Adam popped into a universe which had been created a few days before he appeared, then, when he looked up into the night sky, he saw lights from stars millions of years away from Earth. But there
were no millions of years before that, because God had just created it all. 'Well, God just made it that way,' I hear you say. Really? Then God made a universe filled with lies. He made a tree with a past which never happened. God making a tree with 50 years of rings in it when there were no 50 years is a deception. God made light from stars with a past which never happened; light from a star a million light-years away, when there were no million years, is a lie. God filling the Earth's crust with tons and tons uranium which had already decayed into tons and tons of lead is the same lie. God making a canyon which was already fully cut into the surrounding plain, with miles of fossils underneath from life forms which never lived because it was all created yesterday, is deception on a scale which defies reason, and for which there is no empirical evidence. There is only your contention, 'it might have been so.'
You squeeze through the most implausible mouseholes in order not to see the elephant in the room. Rather than vainly trying to resist the last five centuries of accumulated scientific knowledge about how nature works, it might be more fruitful for you to examine why you feel threatened by deep time.
Nowhere in the Bible is it stated that the Earth was created any specific time ago in the past, neither 6,000 years ago nor 6 billion years ago. The idea that the Earth was created about 6,000 years ago is a specifically
Anglican interpretation propounded by a certain bishop, James Ussher, in 1658 (in his work
Annals). His conclusion was that creation occurred on Sunday, October 23, 4004 B.C. Not every Christian accepts this interpretation and nothing compels you to either.
The eternal salvation of your soul does not depend on your steadfastly holding to the belief that Ussher got it right, even roughly. There is plenty of room within the mainstream Christian tradition for other interpretations of Scripture which do not look silly in light of massively coherent empirical evidence and scientific knowledge of how nature works (and how it does
not work, e.g., Earth-shattering quakes which raise mountain ranges in a matter of hours or days).
As Joseph Campbell said, religion must be roughly compatible with what is known about nature, otherwise it is superstition.