1. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    09 Feb '12 05:05
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    Whatever, it does not matter that I answer your questions or not, it doesn't
    matter that you get anything presented to you, you are right, and cannot be
    wrong. So answering your questions, or calling what is going on here a
    discussion is pointless. You want to bad mouth me about that, run me down
    your good at that.
    Kelly
    You will not answer because you know it will highlight your error. Simple as that.
    I never said I cannot be wrong. I said I cannot be wrong about certain things such as 2+2=4 and World War I. If you believe you could be wrong about everything then it is you that makes discussion pointless as you essentially admit to knowing nothing, and whats worse, believe you are capable of knowing nothing. You can never be right except by chance.
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    09 Feb '12 05:37
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    You will not answer because you know it will highlight your error. Simple as that.
    I never said I cannot be wrong. I said I cannot be wrong about certain things such as 2+2=4 and World War I. If you believe you could be wrong about everything then it is you that makes discussion pointless as you essentially admit to knowing nothing, and whats worse, believe you are capable of knowing nothing. You can never be right except by chance.
    You can't possible be old enough to know about World War I. I was not
    born until right at the end of World War II and I my sure I am older than
    you. I would not even think of claiming I could not be wrong about the
    Vietnam War in which I have lived through and served in the U.S. Army
    during the end of 1964 onward.
  3. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    09 Feb '12 05:44
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You can't possible be old enough to know about World War I.
    You mean I can't possibly old enough to have witnessed it personally.

    I was not born until right at the end of World War II and I my sure I am older than
    you. I would not even think of claiming I could not be wrong about the
    Vietnam War in which I have lived through and served in the U.S. Army
    during the end of 1964 onward.

    You believe that it is possible that World War I and the Vietnam war may never have taken place and may in fact be a grand conspiracy to deceive you? And yet you accept word for word various books from thousands of years ago in the Middle east.
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    09 Feb '12 06:09
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    You mean I can't possibly old enough to have witnessed it personally.

    [b]I was not born until right at the end of World War II and I my sure I am older than
    you. I would not even think of claiming I could not be wrong about the
    Vietnam War in which I have lived through and served in the U.S. Army
    during the end of 1964 onward.

    You believe that ...[text shortened]... And yet you accept word for word various books from thousands of years ago in the Middle east.[/b]
    You are breaking one of Dasa dishonesty rules again. I never said such
    a thing. I said you can be wrong about some knowledge you think you
    have about World War I after you claimed you could not be wrong about
    World War I.
  5. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157652
    09 Feb '12 14:393 edits
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    You will not answer because you know it will highlight your error. Simple as that.
    I never said I cannot be wrong. I said I cannot be wrong about certain things such as 2+2=4 and World War I. If you believe you could be wrong about everything then it is you that makes discussion pointless as you essentially admit to knowing nothing, and whats worse, believe you are capable of knowing nothing. You can never be right except by chance.
    I believe you said you cannot be wrong about the dating methods, if I implied
    anything else, sorry my bad. I'm not quite sure why you think 2+2=4 is on the
    same level as was this here X years ago since all you need for 2+2=4 is on
    the screen not so with dating methods, not sure what you think you cannot be
    wrong about as far as WW1 either! Since that is wrapped up in human records
    and memory why you think that is on the same level as dating methods. I've
    not said we cannot know anything, that is you twisting my words.
    Kelly
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree