I like the approach of finding a subjective claim about the nature of morality that christians could agree with, and then based on that agreement, claims about situational morality can then be considered objective.
Originally posted by @apathist [youtube]rwKkkupUgEI[/youtube]
Fixed the tag.
I like the approach of finding a subjective claim about the nature of morality that christians could agree with, and then based on that agreement, claims about situational morality can then be considered objective.
The head-down-ears-back droning caller reminds me of Fetchmyjunk/dj2becker
Originally posted by @rbhill Moral values are written on the human heart.
So we don't need moral instruction from the gods. On the contrary, we pass judgement on them. We decide right from wrong. You do this in your next sentence.
(Meanwhile, according to the book you must refer to when you answer my next question, your god killed all the babies in the world in a fit of anger. (Except for the baby fish.) And his anger was because his omniscient omnipotent omnibenevolent self didn't like his own work!)
Even though we live in a fallen world people can still do good even though we fall short every day. No one is perfect, of course. But what reason to think the world has 'fallen'?