I am surprised by Dawkins' unwillingness to defend atheism against the top Christian apologist in the world—you'd think someone in his position would jump at the chance.
Granted I gave up on it about half-way through, but unless you're interested in watching a promotional video for William Lane Craig that consists of a lot of REALLY short "sound bites", you should give this one a pass.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOne Granted I gave up on it about half-way through, but unless you're interested in watching a promotional video for William Lane Craig that consists of a lot of really short "sound bites", you should give this one a pass.
Originally posted by epiphinehas I am surprised by Dawkins' unwillingness to defend atheism against the top Christian apologist in the world—you'd think someone in his position would jump at the chance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1ldYmg0lpE
Here's an article on his website as to why he doesn't debate creationists.
Originally posted by Proper Knob Here's an article on his website as to why he doesn't debate creationists.
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/119
Dawkins has invited theologians to answer the arguments against God's existence presented in The God Delusion (e.g., The Ultimate Boeing 747). Dr. Craig has published responses to those arguments in peer reviewed journals and has welcomed the opportunity to point out, in a public forum, exactly how Dawkins' arguments fail—yet Dawkins refuses to either respond to Dr. Craig's critiques or accept an invitation to debate.
Dr. Craig, who has debated almost every prominent atheist besides Dawkins, is definitely not in need of padding his resume. What is clearly at issue here, rather, is Dawkins refusal to defend his arguments.
Originally posted by epiphinehas Dawkins has invited theologians to answer his arguments against God's existence in The God Delusion (i.e., The Ultimate Boeing 747). Dr. Craig has published responses to those arguments in peer reviewed journals and has welcomed the opportunity to point out how Dawkins' arguments fail in a public forum—yet Dawkins refuses to either respond to Dr. ...[text shortened]... s resume. What is clearly at issue here, rather, is Dawkins refusal to defend his arguments.