13 Jun '11 22:04>1 edit
Originally posted by AgergThat's because we Christians have the truth of God on our side.
It's not a cinch trying to debate with creationists for the simple reason they live by the mantra "The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it" - RJHinds is a classic example.
A live debate is all about your ability to perform and your ability to sell - as opposed to how factual your arguments are. Richard Dawkins is correct in avoiding fighting ...[text shortened]... [b]they win!. Debating with them with any expectation the debate has any point is silly.[/b]
Originally posted by AgergYes he did.
[b]Well at least they got him to say that there will be no more apes that
evolve into men, since that is not the way evolution works in these
modern times. A very convenient development.
He didn't say that, he said we didn't evolve from modern monkeys. Trying to explain the distinction to you is a waste of my time.[/b]
Originally posted by twhiteheadI think you misunderstood what divegeester meant in his question:
It is very common and well documented. Everything from genes being copied to insertions by virus's and even whole DNA strands being copied (the last one usually leads to speciation if the resulting organism is viable.) Several well known genetic diseases are a result of the these effects eg Down syndrome:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome
Originally posted by RJHindsno mutation increases the 'genetic information'. it may increase 'the length' or 'amount'. and while not impossible, no 'overall improvement for good' is known - mutations can be interpreted as 'positive' or 'negative' depending on the environment (the exact same mutation might make an organism die in a certain environment, while it allows it to survive, if there would be different circumstances...)
What he was referring to is an increase in the genetic information
that would be an overall improvement for good. Genetic diseases and
Down syndrome does not qualify. So the real answer is a big fat NO.
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou lacked the maturity at the age of 13 to settle the God question.
Education is "brainwashing"? You clearly went to a very bad school.
[b]If the truth of atheism is as painfully obvious as you claim, then it should be a cinch to defend, right? Well, it's not.
It is. We do it all the time in these forums. Even those of us with poor debating skills find it remarkably easy to defend.
Whether atheism is true o ...[text shortened]... o the conclusion that I should not be ridiculing people that clearly hold nonsensical views?
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou lacked the maturity at the age of 13 to settle the God question.
Education is "brainwashing"? You clearly went to a very bad school.
[b]If the truth of atheism is as painfully obvious as you claim, then it should be a cinch to defend, right? Well, it's not.
It is. We do it all the time in these forums. Even those of us with poor debating skills find it remarkably easy to defend.
Whether atheism is true o ...[text shortened]... o the conclusion that I should not be ridiculing people that clearly hold nonsensical views?
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou lacked the maturity at the age of 13 to settle the God question.
Education is "brainwashing"? You clearly went to a very bad school.
[b]If the truth of atheism is as painfully obvious as you claim, then it should be a cinch to defend, right? Well, it's not.
It is. We do it all the time in these forums. Even those of us with poor debating skills find it remarkably easy to defend.
Whether atheism is true o ...[text shortened]... o the conclusion that I should not be ridiculing people that clearly hold nonsensical views?
Originally posted by Proper KnobWhat if it is a true story? Would that change your attitude or would
[b](6) the failure of atheologians to explain away Christ's empty tomb, etc., etc...
I can do that one for you. It's just a story made up by mere mortal humans.[/b]
Originally posted by RJHinds==========================================
That's because we Christians have the truth of God on our side.
Originally posted by tharkeshThe idea that a mutation "might" do good is only speculation. There is
no mutation increases the 'genetic information'. it may increase 'the length' or 'amount'. and while not impossible, no 'overall improvement for good' is known - mutations can be interpreted as 'positive' or 'negative' depending on the environment (the exact same mutation might make an organism die in a certain environment, while it allows it to survive, if there would be different circumstances...)
Originally posted by jaywillThe point of it all is we need God to find the truth.
[b]==========================================
That's because we Christians have the truth of God on our side
==========================================
I think it is more like God won us over to His side through salvation in Christ. Then He could say "See? I am on your side."[/b]