Originally posted by Suzianne
All God requires of us is faith. Even the tiny bit of faith managed by the tiniest mustard seed is enough. But you can't even let yourself be bothered to that miniscule degree, for the One who is responsible for everything you can see around you.
Your monstrous ego requires 'evidence'. After all that has been done for you, you actually think you deser ...[text shortened]... s ALL that His bargain requires. But you can't even give Him that, after all He's done for you.
God hasn't done anything for me, god doesn't exist.
You are failing to understand my position quite spectacularly.
Also your god doesn't 'just' require belief now does he... anyhow...
This is what this argument looks like to me [and probably atheists in general]
I see no evidence whatsoever for the existence of any gods.
As I don't believe in things for which I have no evidence, I don't believe in gods.
YOU [theists in general] claim that there are gods of various kinds and say that
they want me to believe in them and to worship them.
I then say, but I see no evidence that they exist, I have no reason to suppose that
what YOU [theists in general] are telling me is true. And I have plenty of reasons to
suppose that what you are telling me is not true.
IF your [theists in general] god/s want me to believe in them then they [the god/s]
should prove [to those they want to believe] that they exist.
Otherwise I have absolutely no means of telling which,
if any, of the theists telling
me that their god/s exist is actually right.
I am not claiming to be special, or demanding special treatment.
ALL your arguments presuppose that your god exists and is the only option.
I'm sitting here looking at [at least] hundreds of religions and god concepts with no reason
to suppose any is true, or more valid than any other.
Why should I give YOU and YOUR god concept special treatment?
Give me an argument that doesn't already assume your god exists.