13 Jun '07 06:53>
1987 final New Zealand v Australia.. Captain Kirk.. excellent enterprise.
Our turn again this year
With the oval ball of course.
Our turn again this year
With the oval ball of course.
Originally posted by Angry BoyI think I need to see a doctor, I'm agreeing with a Liverpool supporter but my vote also goes for the Italy 3 Brazil 2 game in 1982.
Judging by your posts I don't think you're old enough to have watched it live. 😉
Mine vote goes for Italy 3 Brazil 2, in 1982
Originally posted by Rooney Once a BlueI remember the Italian coach had been continually slated for some dreadful performances. Typical Italians, love being underdogs. Brazil 82 were an incredible team, they slaughtered the best Scotland team ever and decimated Argentina.
I think I need to see a doctor, I'm agreeing with a Liverpool supporter but my vote also goes for the Italy 3 Brazil 2 game in 1982.
The Brazil side had easily the best attacking players in the competition and played such unbelievable attractive football, Zico, Scoratese, Falcao.
Brazil needed only a draw to progress to the semi finals and had ...[text shortened]... me was nearly over Rossi pops up and scores to get a hattrick and shock the world of football.
Originally posted by tawnyowl50 this year and going senile already? You're making yourself look stupid now. I see my last post was pulled for saying just that. Harsh (as it's true, you are) but fair (because it's in the rules).
If Tevez was not signed in the proper manner, as you seem to think, then how can he continue to be an asset in the premiership with another club...if WHU had an advantage, then so did liverpool.........you're the simpleton............as for not being old enough to remember the 1970 final, I was 13.....if brains were a disease you'd live forever.
Originally posted by Angry BoyRead this thick tvvt, and then tell me who's going senile. THEY WERE ELIGABLE ALL SEASON!!!!!!!!!!
50 this year and going senile already? You're making yourself look stupid now. I see my last post was pulled for saying just that. Harsh (as it's true, you are) but fair (because it's in the rules).
One last time. West Ham did not own Tevez and Mascherano this made them ineligible under PL rules. When LFC bought Mascherano they did so from the company t ...[text shortened]... Liverpool player, owned by Liverpool hence he's not ineligible to play for them.
GET IT?
Originally posted by fizzz24Your own words:
[b]Read this thick tvvt, and then tell me who's going senile. THEY WERE ELIGABLE ALL SEASON!!!!!!!!!!
"The Board decided that in order for Mr Tevez to be eligible to play, West Ham would be required to take immediate action either to modify the offending third party contract in a manner satisfactory to the Board or alternatively terminate outright."
Originally posted by Angry BoyThis is the last post I'm making on this, if the player was originally ineligable for whu, how can the transfer to the scousers be eligable? Just because he moved on, does that make everthing hunky dory? He obviously
Your own words:
"In order for Mr Tevez to be eligible to play"?
So he must have been ineligible before that then?
No more questions your honour.
Originally posted by Tirau Danyeh .The semi was pretty good to...who was that against ..oh yes portugal
Not Pretty but still Englands finest hour.. all other results are insignificant.
1966 England 4 - Germany 2
And yep I watched it live on the box as a kid and collected every player in bubble gum cards.. they were champions of the world and very massive hero's to children of the sixties... the controversy didn't matter a fig!