The NFL says the catch call was correct.http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/story/2012/09/25/nfl-admits-error-in-seahawks-packers-game-but--upholds-result/57840636/1
I think the OPI should have been called but I'm also not surprised it was not. I think the call in the endzone is the correct one based on the rules.
I can't find anything in the rules that show tate didn't have possesion of the ball since he clearly had one hand on it in the air and both hands as they come down to the ground. Thus, the rule on mutual possession takes over. However, I would like to see a rule change on this because even though it helped my team today it might kill them tomorrow.
Originally posted by tomtom232 I think the OPI should have been called but I'm also not surprised it was not. I think the call in the endzone is the correct one based on the rules.
I can't find anything in the rules that show tate didn't have possesion of the ball since he clearly had one hand on it in the air and both hands as they come down to the ground. Thus, the rule on mutual p ...[text shortened]... rule change on this because even though it helped my team today it might kill them tomorrow.
From the link I gave:
And Item 5 of the same rule that states, "If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers"
However, Item 5 also includes a sentence that would seem damning to the argument it was a touchdown and support the case for an interception: "It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control." Replays clearly seems to show Jennings had the ball in both hands and Tate then gained simultaneous possession.
Originally posted by no1marauder From the link I gave:
And Item 5 of the same rule that states, "If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers"
However, Item 5 also includes a sentence that would seem damning to the argument it was a touchdown and support the case for an interception: [b]"It is n ...[text shortened]... ultaneous possession.
Tate admitted as much. The refs blew the call.[/b]
Originally posted by no1marauder LMAO! There's no hope for a homer like you.
You didn't even watch it. I can tell.
Edit: The dispute here is that everybody believes that jennings caught the ball before tate even touches it... if you watch you will see that they catch it at the same time... simple.
If this had been the other way around this play would be in the news just as much... as the #1 top play in week 3.
Originally posted by no1marauder I've watched the play over and over again. Like 99.9% of commentators, I saw a clear interception and a blown call.
No you are a sheep that would agree with them whatever they say. If it was GB that made that play everybody would be touting it as a MNF miracle and a top play.
Also, everybody says that the ref waving off the play had the better view... that is another falsehood all he could see was the back of jennings helmet.
Originally posted by tomtom232 You didn't even watch it. I can tell.
Edit: The dispute here is that everybody believes that jennings caught the ball before tate even touches it... if you watch you will see that they catch it at the same time... simple.
If this had been the other way around this play would be in the news just as much... as the #1 top play in week 3.
You're full of crap. Jennings out-leaps Tate and has the ball in his hands well before Tate. Then he chests it.
I have no dog in this hunt, but only the most blatant homer would claim that wasn't a pick. And even the NFL acknowledged the obvious push off that knocked Shields to the ground.