25 Mar '12 03:36>
Originally posted by moon1969Objective data? Anything applauded by the Daily Kos is far from objective. The study you cite is not normative, lacks peer review and is really a bunch of horse puckey. Any "alleged" study lacking peer review and official sanction by a multitude of studies, corroborative data, re-study, psychometric testing to gauge the results and mountains of proof is merely anecdotal and worthless. Just think about substituting a racial minority or females and such for so called low IQ people and you start seeing the problem with drivel like you cite. Any study painting with such broad strokes an entire group of people fails based on bias alone. Racism is too complex a problem to attribute solely to low IQ for as such then everyone of low IQ would be racist or conservative. Again I go back to leftists. Obama campaigned in "all 57 states". Such a dumb statement makes his IQ suspect and therefore a racist? The very idea stinks to high heaven as a study such as the one you cite is a lengthy non sequitur. BTW, I do believe BHO is a racist, but not because of his IQ. It is his association with the Rev. Wright and Professor Bell, formerly of Harvard. Lastly you are not surprised because you harbor elitist ideas and grandiose opinions about yourself as a "not one of them", lack curiosity to apply critical analysis to drivel studies and are so inclined to believe garbage because you obviously revert to your factory settings, ie, liberal, and hence anything "probative" of others who differ from you politically, viewing them as too stupid to not believe as you do. Again I repeat this speaks quite more loudly about you than about the subjects of the study you cite.
I was just merely alluding to the massive amounts of objective data out there linking low IQ with social/religious conservatives.
Many of the rest of us are not surprised,