25 Sep '08 09:08>
Originally posted by Angry BoyNice reply Anrgy Boy.
.. you're squirming again.
Bottom line - You haven't won 18 championships. Yes, the FA Cup is worth more than the League Cup - but that doesn't mean that League Cups don't count if you want to use your analogy of the most succesful "English" side. Those cups were won in England just like the FA Cup. The reason you don't want to include them is because ...[text shortened]... LISH FOOTBALL'S MOST SUCCESSFUL TEAM BOTH DOMESTICALLY AND IN EUROPE.
I agree with some of what you say, a nice balanced reply and i was a little drunk when I wrote that post, lol.
Bottom line - You haven't won 18 championships. Yes, the FA Cup is worth more than the League Cup - but that doesn't mean that League Cups don't count
Of course I'm jelous of your history, I will openly aknowledge this. Diccussions like this are part of the banter and fun of supporting football clubs with great rivalrys.
The reason I discount domestically everything except the League Title and FA Cup is obvious. The League cup is not taken seriously. The FA Cup and the League Title are.
Look at the teams that have played this week in the league cup, it is good to win but it has no weight in calculating how great a club side is.
I don't understand why you think 1 league cup win = 1 Fa Cup or 1 League title win.
The league cup etc is good to win but has no real value when trying to quantify the history of a clubs sucess.
You know this and because we have almost caught you up in FA Cup + Leagye titles , you hang on to meaningless League cup totals.
If you want to leave the obvious fact that we've won the European Cup 5 times to your 3 aside - then use the word "domestically". Still, as I've pointed out above, it doesn't matter anyway.
Liverpool are the most sucessful club domestically and in Europe, I have always agreed with this.
If United win the league one more time we are the most sucessful side domestically IMHO.
You are still the most sucessful English side in Europe.
Come on, please have the humility to aknowledge Uniteds sucess if we reach or pass your standards.
Unied never get any respect from Liverpool supporters for winning the treble for example, sad.
If the European Cup is harder to win now - how do you explain the fact that you can finish 4th in the premiership to qualify, finish second in your group to qualify for the knockout stages and then avoid the strongest sides (i.e. the other English ones) in the 1st round knockout?
Ok, here are 3 examples why its harder to win now
(1) To win in 1999 United played Munic 3 times, Barcelona 2 times, Inter 2 times, juventus 2 times, wow.........
(2) To win in 2008, United had to play Barcelona 2 times, Chelsea in the final (they wold not have been in the competition in the old European Cup) and Chelsea are the 2nd best team in Europe.
Roma numerous times (the 2nd best side in Italy).
(3)You always have to play all the best teams in Europe to win the cup.
In the old days you played much less games, like you say the best 4 teams in all the top countires are there to win it, that speaks for itself.
Torres has been injured, he was out for 2 weeks and barely trained before the Utd game. Yes, he hasn't looked great yet but to say he's suffering 2nd season syndrome in September is just wishful thinking on your part. Keane will come good (a bit like Berbatov)
You got me here.
I think Torres is great but you need to structure your team a little around him to get the best from him.
End of the day though, he is top class.
Vidic and Van der sar would be in my joke team of the season so far. Errors galore. Ferdinand's concentration has been found wandering around London on more than one occasion too. Your central midfield sounds great (and it is) but I said that they've not performed this season. They haven't.
Vidic has been injured and not match fit (LIKE TORRES), but he has proved he is world class over the last 2 seasons.
Ferdinand is finally WC, he did have concentration problems but over the last 18 months he has much improved.
VDS has spells when he plays bad for a while but overall he is a good asset for United.
Where did I say Gerrard was better than Ronaldo? BTW, he is. I'd have him at fullback, centre back, centre midfield (defensively or attacking) and as a second striker over Ronaldo. In fact, Ronaldo only shades it on the flanks and lone striker positions. Now, read those words carefully, before you try claiming that I've said Ronaldo's crap!
Above you say Gerrard is better than Ronaldo.
The fact is that Ronaldo has been rated as best player in the Premiership 2 years running.
Ronaldo scored in 1 season almost half the entire goals Gerrard has in 10 seasons.
Ronaldo is almost certainly about to be crowned world player of the year.
Ronaldo gets more assists then Gerrard.
Ronaldo plays 3 positions right wing, left wing and 2nd striker, in all these positions he is better than Gerrard,
He's a better set piece player than Gerrard.
He's a better header of the ball than Gerrard.
He's better Internationally than Gerrard.
He has a better goals and assists per game ratio to Gerrard, domestically and in Europe.
PS - you're obviously looking forward to being able to call your team the "most successful (something or other) ever". I think we all realise why you have such a bee in your bonnet about Liverpool Football Club.
ENGLISH FOOTBALL'S MOST SUCCESSFUL TEAM BOTH DOMESTICALLY AND IN EUROPE.
Yes you are right.
Right now all I can say is we are the biggest side in world football.
And we are the only side to win the treble, but obviously you won't give us any credit for that.
Hopefully very soon I'll be able to say we are also the most sucessful English domestic side in football history.
Reason being almost every disucssion ends up with a final line from a Liverpool supported saying 18 times or 5 times.
Well get ready boys, you are soon going to lose the 18 times quote.