Originally posted by whodey You are correct. I think beating a team one time during the year should suffice. What do you want, the best of 2 out of 3 or just one more shot?
I meant OSU is AFRAID of Michigan. They wanna play anyone but them!
Originally posted by Falco Lombardi I meant OSU is AFRAID of Michigan. They wanna play anyone but them!
I would not say they are afraid. After all, Tressel has a 5-1 record against them. If anyone should be AFRAID it is Carr. After all, he is faced with the possibility of that record jumping from 4-1 to 6-1 in the same season. Carr has become their own Cooper if you know what I mean. To equal Coopers wasted years of 1-10 against them we only need five more straight wins. LOL.
Originally posted by whodey I would not say they are afraid. After all, Tressel has a 5-1 record against them. If anyone should be AFRAID it is Carr. After all, he is faced with the possibility of that record jumping from 4-1 to 6-1 in the same season. Carr has become their own Cooper if you know what I mean. To equal Coopers wasted years of 1-10 against them we only need five more straight wins. LOL.
Carr is not afraid of playing for the National Championship...He wants to.
Originally posted by Falco Lombardi Carr is not afraid of playing for the National Championship...He wants to.
Notice that I said SHOULD be afraid? Naturally, Carr has already lost and therefore has little else to lose other than losing once more, but the losses to OSU are adding up very quickly and will be forever associated with his coaching legacy.
Lets assume the impossible happens. Lets assume that team up north goes to the big game and wins? They will then have the exact same record, no? Who then is #1?
Originally posted by whodey Notice that I said SHOULD be afraid? Naturally, Carr has already lost and therefore has little else to lose other than losing once more, but the losses to OSU are adding up very quickly and will be forever associated with his coaching legacy.
Lets assume the impossible happens. Lets assume that team up north goes to the big game and wins? They will then have the exact same record, no? Who then is #1?
Michigan because then they would have won the title.
Originally posted by Falco Lombardi Michigan because then they would have won the title.
But OSU has already beaten them. You are suggesting we should play a second time to decide the issue so if they each beat each other I could then argue using the same logic as you are now. We need to play 2 out of 3 to really decide who should own the title. After all, how could one team that has the identical record as the other be any worse or better than the other?