It's crazy that they're up against each other.
So, let's take a poll, who's going to watch what?
I'll flip around to both, but I'll probably spend most of the time on the hockey game; especially in the first 3 quarters of the NBA game. Basketball doesn't really get interesting until the fourth quarter. In the NHL, the deciding goal can be scored at any moment.
Originally posted by sh76Game 5 mostly. But I'll definitely be flipping to Game 2 during commercials and intermissions.
It's crazy that they're up against each other.
So, let's take a poll, who's going to watch what?
I'll flip around to both, but I'll probably spend most of the time on the hockey game; especially in the first 3 quarters of the NBA game. Basketball doesn't really get interesting until the fourth quarter. In the NHL, the deciding goal can be scored at any moment.
Originally posted by sh76Hockey of course! 😉
It's crazy that they're up against each other.
So, let's take a poll, who's going to watch what?
I'll flip around to both, but I'll probably spend most of the time on the hockey game; especially in the first 3 quarters of the NBA game. Basketball doesn't really get interesting until the fourth quarter. In the NHL, the deciding goal can be scored at any moment.
Originally posted by sh76The Celtic-Laker game more than doubled the ratings of Black Hawk-Flyer one. http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/06/07/tv-ratings-sunday-nba-finals-and-nhl-stanley-cup-finals-both-up-from-last-year/53289
It's crazy that they're up against each other.
So, let's take a poll, who's going to watch what?
I'll flip around to both, but I'll probably spend most of the time on the hockey game; especially in the first 3 quarters of the NBA game. Basketball doesn't really get interesting until the fourth quarter. In the NHL, the deciding goal can be scored at any moment.
Originally posted by no1marauderThat's a great rating for the NHL; looks like the best since 2002.
The Celtic-Laker game more than doubled the ratings of Black Hawk-Flyer one. http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/06/07/tv-ratings-sunday-nba-finals-and-nhl-stanley-cup-finals-both-up-from-last-year/53289
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/22/nhl-stanley-cup-finals-tv-ratings-1995-2008/19333
Plus, considering it was up against the NBA finals, that makes it more impressive.
I know it sounds strange to say this but getting almost half of an NBA finals uber-marquee matchup head to head is a very impressive showing for the NHL.
Originally posted by sh76If you say so. I wonder how many primetime network shows don't muster 5-6 million viewers.
That's a great rating for the NHL; looks like the best since 2002.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/22/nhl-stanley-cup-finals-tv-ratings-1995-2008/19333
Plus, considering it was up against the NBA finals, that makes it more impressive.
I know it sounds strange to say this but getting almost half of an NBA finals uber-marquee matchup head to head is a very impressive showing for the NHL.
The NHL remains small time.
Originally posted by gregsflatThe NBA with "an image problem" still buried the NHL in the TV ratings.
I think the NBA has a image problem. They have the national stars, but her comes Hockey to take a front seat on head to head television. It's the first time I've seen orange Flyers shirts in "the hood".
Originally posted by no1marauderOf course the NHL "remains small time" compared to the NBA. It always has been. But it's less small time than it used to be, which is all you can really ask for in a sport.
If you say so. I wonder how many primetime network shows don't muster 5-6 million viewers.
The NHL remains small time.
Originally posted by no1marauderThe NHL will always be "small time" in the eyes of most Americans except in places where the game is actually played by people/kids. Why on Earth the NHL thought they needed to expand into places like Florida, Arizona and California is beyond me.
The NHL remains small time.
Originally posted by sh76I think that most people would watch the NBA.
It's crazy that they're up against each other.
So, let's take a poll, who's going to watch what?
I'll flip around to both, but I'll probably spend most of the time on the hockey game; especially in the first 3 quarters of the NBA game. Basketball doesn't really get interesting until the fourth quarter. In the NHL, the deciding goal can be scored at any moment.
Originally posted by darvlayTrue. Measure the NHL against the NBA in Boston, Chicago, Minnesota, Buffalo, Detroit, etc. (cities where waters freeze in the winter, and the NHL is quite competitive.
The NHL will always be "small time" in the eyes of most Americans except in places where the game is actually played by people/kids. Why on Earth the NHL thought they needed to expand into places like Florida, Arizona and California is beyond me.
Originally posted by darvlayI agree!
The NHL will always be "small time" in the eyes of most Americans except in places where the game is actually played by people/kids. Why on Earth the NHL thought they needed to expand into places like Florida, Arizona and California is beyond me.
It must be quite a job trying to keep the ice up, not to mention very costly!
Does anyone actually go to the games? I would imagine they have to have people going to make ends meet.