Originally posted by no1marauder
Baloney. If you don't win your conference, you don't deserve to be in a playoff. Put the 6 BCS conference champions and two wild cards from the mid majors or independents. You could even keep the bowl tie ins if that would be needed to convince the powers that be.
EDIT: Specifically my proposal was as follows:
Clearly a playoff system is needed and range - ACC; and Fiesta (Big 12) team with the appropriately rated opponent in reverse order.
I understand you point #1, but there is a fly in the ointment. In your "conference champion" requirement, you are running into potential problems. First, in the larger, two division conferences, you will force them to retain the conference championship game. That additional game coupled with the playoofs would provide a huge advantage to the at large teams who don't have to play that extra game. The second problem I see is what happens when you have three conference teams that end up with identical records, yet two of them did play the other? Now, it would be possible that the best team might be left out because their RPI wasn't as strong due to the conference schedule. It is impractical for 12 team conferences to play 11 conference games and no outside games. The same is really true of all of the major conferences. I don't think the NCAA is ready to go in and re-distribute the teams and conferences to 9 team conferences where they play 8 conference games and the best conference record advances. That would make for a clean playoff system if they developed eight 9 team conferences, but it would sure foul up old time allegiances.
There really is no real sure fire way to do this fairly where someone doesn't get screwed sometimes. But I do agree that a playoff system of some sort is needed to save the game.
You know, another possibility is to go to a tiered championship playoff system. You could have the division A which the top half of teams will be playing for, and then you have the lower tier divison B which the lower half of teams would play for. In this way, the bigger stronger teams USC, Texas, OU, Notre Dame, etc.... would be in the upper division, while your Boston Colleges, East Carolinas, Brigham Youngs, etc... would compete. You would actually have two national champions. But it would give Boise State, Hawaii, and the other schools who only occasionally produce a competitive team on the major scale, a chance to compete legitimately every year. The Division A title would be even more impressive and it wouldn't be diluted by the addition of a lower tier National Champion. They are already doing this in High School in Texas, and I am sure in other states as well, so why not at the collegiate level? By paring down the number of teams competing, it makes a playoff much more viable.
Just a thought.