- Joined
- 10 Dec 11
- Moves
- 143494
18 Jun 17
Now, after 2 incomlete games on Confederation Cup, and after to first admitted and then quickly denied goals, I must say that I prefer old corrupted plagued-by-human-errors system.
Soccer must not be changed. It's a game on the grass, from Middle Age, old fashioned mob game in the hands of mafia and laundry chains.
No sense at all in engaging supreme high tech in such atavistic competition.
23 Jun 17
Originally posted by vanderveldeI agree. I think it must be amateur as well. Sports took a nosedive when it became a profitable commodity.
Now, after 2 incomlete games on Confederation Cup, and after to first admitted and then quickly denied goals, I must say that I prefer old corrupted plagued-by-human-errors system.
Soccer must not be changed. It's a game on the grass, from Middle Age, old fashioned mob game in the hands of mafia and laundry chains.
No sense at all in engaging supreme high tech in such atavistic competition.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 19036
24 Jun 17
Originally posted by vanderveldeRugby has it, tennis has it, cricket has it, American football has it... football should have it as well. Anything which removes human error is a good thing, people are stupid.
Now, after 2 incomlete games on Confederation Cup, and after to first admitted and then quickly denied goals, I must say that I prefer old corrupted plagued-by-human-errors system.
Soccer must not be changed. It's a game on the grass, from Middle Age, old fashioned mob game in the hands of mafia and laundry chains.
No sense at all in engaging supreme high tech in such atavistic competition.
25 Jun 17
Originally posted by Trev33Going by the trial in the federations cup and people using it are the most stupid
Rugby has it, tennis has it, cricket has it, American football has it... football should have it as well. Anything which removes human error is a good thing, people are stupid.
I am against the idea. Like to use the excuse "we were robbed" which sometimes is true
23 Jul 17
Originally posted by @vanderveldeIf your strike bounced over the goaline then spun back into play, would you say the same thing?
Now, after 2 incomlete games on Confederation Cup, and after to first admitted and then quickly denied goals, I must say that I prefer old corrupted plagued-by-human-errors system.
Soccer must not be changed. It's a game on the grass, from Middle Age, old fashioned mob game in the hands of mafia and laundry chains.
No sense at all in engaging supreme high tech in such atavistic competition.
23 Jul 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @trev33Especially with such low scores
Rugby has it, tennis has it, cricket has it, American football has it... football should have it as well. Anything which removes human error is a good thing, people are stupid.
24 Jul 17
Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracksA goal is worth more than Smith getting a duck.
Hi Karoly
Is all relative. You saying a goal is worth more than, in a Test, getting Steve Smith for 0 on a review?
Soccer tried it on the recent Summer competition on ALL decisions, and was a mess
However the review system in cricket in quite contraversial as well.
At the end you gotta work out - statistically - which is fairer.
And since pay tv has robbed us of the EPL , and most other high quality football matches I'm in no position to judge.