Originally posted by skeeter
But nooo, you just grandstanded as faggoty little poofs tend to do. Well you know naff all about chess a less about me. So go and rattle someone else's cage you squirmy piece of weasel faeces.[/b]
Now you are doing it again. What makes it fair calling me a 'little poof' and 'weasel faeces' just because I have an opinion based on something I found questionable that just happened to be partly about you? There is no need to do so and makes you level in human socialization quite clear, I guess...
I did not claim you and your opponent agreed to a deal. I was questioning if that was the case. Hence the question mark! No accusation here or to interpret it like that, that went further than the original question by Redmike. I am not saying "Skeeter, you are a cheating poof", that would not only be silly, but it would be a conclusion based on nothing. I was questioning based on what I saw, which means it is open for discussion. For instance a contribution on your behalf explaining the results as they are. If you are interested, that is. If not, that's fine, but do not call people names just because they think something strange happened.
But say I accuse you openly, could you defend yourself in this matter then? Just because I am curious as Redmike is...? Please, hold your insults this time.