25 Feb '15 18:38>
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-world-superconductors.html
Originally posted by sonhouseI have read it and doesn't look too hopeful to me. They haven't even proved it definitely superconducts at 100k -only an experimental result that shows it might do. And that doesn't beat the would record which is, if I remember correctly, about 150k (can anyone say exactly what it is? )
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-world-superconductors.html
Originally posted by humy134 K comes to mind. But the thing about this result is it is a completely different approach. Maybe that is what is needed to spur further progress.
I have read it and doesn't look too hopeful to me. They haven't even proved it definitely superconducts at 100k -only an experimental result that shows it might do. And that doesn't beat the would record which is, if I remember correctly, about 150k (can anyone say exactly what it is? )
Still, I am sure one day someone will make the kind of breakthrough we all want to hear.
Originally posted by sonhouseyes, hopefully.
134 K comes to mind. But the thing about this result is it is a completely different approach. Maybe that is what is needed to spur further progress.
Originally posted by humyI got the temp of LN2, comes in at 77 degrees Kelvin. So anything above that and you have a nice superconductor.
yes, maybe.
I got the ~150k figure by looking at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-temperature_superconductivity#mediaviewer/File😕c_history.gif