Originally posted by Marinkatomb
This is a very strange game. 7.bxc3? White accepts three pawn islands with no perceivable counter play. If nothing else black can just engineer a trade of Queens and have an unlosable ending. Against someone like Karpov you might as well resign right there.
7.dxc3 ..Qxd1 8.Kxd1 might lose the right to castle, but it at least maintains whites structure. With the Queens off the board castling becomes less important anyway.
you know Marinkatomb i was following another game, a Kasparov game, let me show it to you, for it was amazing in my mind, look at the way Kasparovs pawns end up, they are a total mess, yet it seems that he stands better, game was simul against Argentinian team.
[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"] [Result "*"] 1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.d4 Be7 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Bg5 O-O 6.e3 Nbd7 7.Qc2 c6 8.Rd1 b6 9.Bd3 h6 10.Bh4 Bb7 11.O-O c5 12.Bg3 { this is one of those really quiet moves that hard to understand, fact is, black queen is uncomfortable after the position opens. } 12...cxd4 13.exd4 dxc4 14.Bxc4 { and Kasperov has an IQP, which may or may not prove to be a weakness, in theory } 14...Bxf3 15.gxf3 { and look at whites pawns now in comparison to blacks, black has no weaknesses and whites are all over the place, gulp, yet the commentator mentioned that white stands better, why? } 15...Nh5 16.d5 Nxg3 17.hxg3 exd5 18.Nxd5 Bd6 19.Ne3 Bc5 20.Nf5 Rc8 21.Nxh6 gxh6 22.Qg6 Kh8 23.Qxh6 Kg8 24.Qg6 Kh8 25.Qh5 Kg7 26.Qg4 Kh6 27.Rxd7 Qe8 28.Kg2 { and the rook is coming to the h file. } *
1. first point is that while something may be a theoretical weakness, in truth it may not be weak at all, this I understand.
2. second point is that i find this game disturbing, i love my pawns, my whole concept of chess is built around pawns and here Kasparov dismisses everything that I understand as a lie!
why despite Kasparovs pawns does he stand better? This i do not understand.