02 Apr '15 23:13>
Why shouldn't people be able to make personal religious belief choices based on their supporting document from which they get their beliefs about right and wrong against Whom they think is God when the choice may inconvenience someone else?
This is certainly not the only example, but for one example, if Muslims and Christians believe that making a cake for or providing flowers for a coupling of people by a so-called marriage when the 2 people want to have sex with each other when the genders are the same is against God, why should they be mandated by anyone to provide the cake or flowers?
For Christians, it isn't about not liking someone or not loving someone, but based on the Holy Bible it is about the act of sex being performed by 2 people of the same sex and who are not married in the sight of Whom they believe is God.
As for Muslims, I am not sure what the Quran tells about sex between 2 people of the same gender who are not married.
This is certainly not the only example, but for one example, if Muslims and Christians believe that making a cake for or providing flowers for a coupling of people by a so-called marriage when the 2 people want to have sex with each other when the genders are the same is against God, why should they be mandated by anyone to provide the cake or flowers?
For Christians, it isn't about not liking someone or not loving someone, but based on the Holy Bible it is about the act of sex being performed by 2 people of the same sex and who are not married in the sight of Whom they believe is God.
As for Muslims, I am not sure what the Quran tells about sex between 2 people of the same gender who are not married.