1. Joined
    03 Mar '05
    Moves
    45948
    05 Apr '05 19:34
    Okay, 99.5% of pawn promotions are to Q; most of the rest are to N, and a few are to R to avoid stalemates. Has anyone ever seen a game with an underpromotion to a B for legitimate chess reasons (and not just for the fun of it)?

    Thanks, C.I.
  2. CN85nm
    Joined
    31 Jul '04
    Moves
    13184
    05 Apr '05 19:40
    Check out a google search for
    underpromotion to a bishop chess

    several examples, one of them requiring 4 consecutive underpromotions as each Bishop promotion threatened mate.

    post any good ones you find.

    f
  3. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    05 Apr '05 20:18
    http://home.comcast.net/~joyner.david/wdj/chess/Elkies07.html
  4. Joined
    29 Jul '01
    Moves
    8818
    05 Apr '05 22:35
    I promoted a pawn to a Bishop one time. I clicked the wrong button.
  5. over your head
    Joined
    12 Jul '04
    Moves
    23004
    05 Apr '05 23:06
    There are chess problems which involve underpromotion to a bishop in order to solve. I doubt there are many actual real games where it is a necessity, but some people underpromote in a winning position just to show off
  6. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    05 Apr '05 23:42
    Originally posted by Siskin
    There are chess problems which involve underpromotion to a bishop in order to solve. I doubt there are many actual real games where it is a necessity, but some people underpromote in a winning position just to show off
    I know someone who has promoted to a bishop to give him two bishops and was going to mate with those. Just to show off. Then he realised he had two lightsquared bishops and it was drawn. Serves him right.

    Whenever underpromotion comes up I give the Babson Task as an example:


    White to move and Mate in 4.

    The main solution lines are as follows:

    1.a7!
    1...axb1=Q 2.axb8=Q
    Qxb2(!) 3.Qxb3 Qc3 4.Qxc3#
    Qe4(!) 3.Qxf4 Qxf4 4.Rxf4#
    1...axb1=R(!) 2.axb8=R! Rxb2(!)3.Rxb3 Kxc4 4.Qa4#
    2.axb8=Q? Rxb2! 3.Qxb3 1/2-1/2
    1...axb1=B(!) 2.axb8=B! Be4(!) 3.Bxf4 B- 4.Be3(5)#
    2.axb8=Q? Be4! 3.Qxf4 1/2-1/2
    1...axb1=N(!) 2.axb8=N! Nxd2(!) 3.Qc1! Ne4 4.Nc6#
    2.axb8=Q? Nxd2! 3.Qxf4+ Kc3
    3.Rxf4+ Ne4
    3.Qc1 Ne4

    As you can see white must promote to the same piece that black does if he wants to mate in 4.
    For more information and analysis http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess/babs.html
  7. Standard memberbuffalobill
    Major Bone
    On yer tail ...
    Joined
    28 Feb '05
    Moves
    16686
    06 Apr '05 11:53
    Generally underpromotion is used to prevent stalemate, sometimes to mate (with N), sometimes to confuse, and sometimes to remind the other bugger it's about time he resigned.

    There's a nice article at http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/minor.htm where there's at least one underpromotion to B used in actual play.
  8. Joined
    30 Oct '04
    Moves
    7813
    06 Apr '05 12:341 edit
    Originally posted by CrawlIce
    Okay, 99.5% of pawn promotions are to Q; most of the rest are to N, and a few are to R to avoid stalemates. Has anyone ever seen a game with an underpromotion to a B for legitimate chess reasons (and not just for the fun of it)?

    Thanks, C.I.
    As in all underpromotions the only sensible reasons are:
    1)To avoid stalemate (the most common)
    2) To win a piece (Knight falls neatly here)
    An example:


    White cannot play:
    1.cxbQ(R) due to stalemate; 1.cxbN leads to draw, so the only option is 1.cxbB and White wins.
  9. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    06 Apr '05 16:02
    Originally posted by ilywrin
    As in all underpromotions the only sensible reasons are:
    1)To avoid stalemate (the most common)
    2) To win a piece (Knight falls neatly here)
    An example:

    [fen]1r6/2P5/8/8/8/2N5/8/k6K [/fen]
    White cannot play:
    1.cxbQ(R) due to stalemate; 1.cxbN leads to draw, so the only option is 1.cxbB and White wins.
    Isn't this an amazing study (the full one) where two different variants require two different underpromotions?
  10. Standard membergumbie
    The man himself
    Totally lost
    Joined
    30 Jun '04
    Moves
    134707
    07 Apr '05 22:31
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ


    Whenever underpromotion comes up I give the Babson Task as an example:

    [fen]Bq1B1K2/3Pp3/P3Pp2/P1p2P2/2Pk1b1R/1p6/pN1P1P2/QR6 w - - 0 1[/fen]
    White to move and Mate in 4.

    The main solution lines are as follows:

    [b]1.a7!
    1...axb1=Q 2.axb8=Q
    Qxb2(!) 3.Qxb3 Qc3 4.Qxc3#
    Qe4(!) 3.Qxf4 Qxf4 4.Rxf4#
    1.. ...[text shortened]... nts to mate in 4.
    For more information and analysis http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess/babs.html
    This is pure beauty.
  11. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    10 Apr '05 22:09
    Originally posted by gumbie
    This is pure beauty.
    I completely agree. It stunned me for a week when I first saw it.
  12. Joined
    21 Jul '04
    Moves
    38677
    11 Apr '05 07:53
    Here is a pice of teory : 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 (Albin counter gambit) 3.dxe d4 And now 4.e3? Bb4+ 5.Bd2 dxe 6.Bxb4 exf2+ 7.Ke2 fxg1 (N)+

  13. Joined
    21 Jul '04
    Moves
    38677
    11 Apr '05 08:12
    And it's accualy been played a couple of times. Look it up on the online database at chessbase.com
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree