1. Joined
    29 Aug '05
    Moves
    9918
    08 Mar '07 03:00
    I was just exposed to an automatic draw which was caused by an unknown to me event. Turns out I had 10 pieces including a Rook and a Queen and he was only with his King and the game came up at a draw when I cornered him and left him no place to move. I heard that you must always leave an out or put him in check! This really ticked me off since I was so far ahead of him and the win was a no-brainer. I learned a tough lesson on this one.
  2. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12451
    08 Mar '07 07:55
    Originally posted by Relayman
    I was just exposed to an automatic draw which was caused by an unknown to me event. Turns out I had 10 pieces including a Rook and a Queen and he was only with his King and the game came up at a draw when I cornered him and left him no place to move. I heard that you must always leave an out or put him in check! This really ticked me off since I was so far ahead of him and the win was a no-brainer. I learned a tough lesson on this one.
    It's called stalemate, and it's a normal (though not often-occuring) part of chess.

    Richard
  3. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    08 Mar '07 08:03
    Originally posted by Relayman
    ... when I cornered him and left him no place to move. I heard that you must always leave an out or put him in check!
    Why didn't you leave him with a square where he could move the king to? Were your moves forced?
  4. Standard memberMCA
    TokerSmurf
    Bonnie Scotland
    Joined
    16 Jun '04
    Moves
    15683
    08 Mar '07 14:171 edit
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Why didn't you leave him with a square where he could move the king to? Were your moves forced?
    doesn't appear to be.

    Game 3146395
  5. London
    Joined
    05 Mar '03
    Moves
    6047
    08 Mar '07 23:57
    Avoiding giving stalemate is just one of those things you have to learn, like castling and the en passant rule. Along with trying to get a draw by repetition, it gives a hope of rescuing something to a player who is down on material. Actually, it's quite surprising that you have been playing this long and not run into it before.

    It's interesting to consider what alternative there could be to the stalemate rule: if you haven't checkmated your opponent, you clearly haven't won, but if he has no legal move, the game has to stop; neither player has won, so it must be a draw. One might that the rules could forbid you to make a move that would lead to stalemate, but what if you had no other legal moves yourself? - stalemate again!
  6. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    09 Mar '07 02:06
    Originally posted by RolandYoung
    Avoiding giving stalemate is just one of those things you have to learn, like castling and the en passant rule. Along with trying to get a draw by repetition, it gives a hope of rescuing something to a player who is down on material. Actually, it's quite surprising that you have been playing this long and not run into it before.

    It's interesting to co ...[text shortened]... uld lead to stalemate, but what if you had no other legal moves yourself? - stalemate again!

    Black to move.

    1. Re5+ Kb6 1/2-1/2

    And as a bonus Re5+ is the only move that draws for Black.
  7. Standard memberFrank Burns
    Great Big Stees
    Account suspended
    Joined
    12 Mar '04
    Moves
    10441
    09 Mar '07 12:281 edit
    Maybe he could have backed his King out and promoted a Pawn or two?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree