26 Mar '21 02:56>
If Joe goes to sleep at a random time between 10 pm and 11 pm, and sleep for a random length of time between 8 to 10 hours, What is the probability that he wakes up before 8:30 am?
@joe-shmo saidIt will depend on whether it is the night that the clocks are adjusted for daylight saving!
If Joe goes to sleep at a random time between 10 pm and 11 pm, and sleep for a random length of time between 8 to 10 hours, What is the probability that he wakes up before 8:30 am?
@venda saidIts not! No tricks like that.
It will depend on whether it is the night that the clocks are adjusted for daylight saving!
@joe-shmo saidO.K mate.
Its not! No tricks like that.
@venda saidWell, that's actually a step in the right direction. Except he doesn't have to go to bed at 10:29, he could go to bed at 10:29:59 etc... The time he has to go to bed has to be: T ≤ 10:30 to wake up at most "exactly" at 8:30 ( the probability of waking "exactly" at 8:30 is actually 0 ).
It will depend on whether it is the night that the clocks are adjusted for daylight saving!
All I can say for now is to guarantee waking before 08:30 am(prob =1) and not knowing how long you will sleep for you must go to sleep by 10:29pm
Sleep well.
@joe-shmo saidThis can be seen as the sum of two independent uniformly distributed random variables.
If Joe goes to sleep at a random time between 10 pm and 11 pm, and sleep for a random length of time between 8 to 10 hours, What is the probability that he wakes up before 8:30 am?
@joe-shmo saidHis slight error comes from the fact that he is effectively treating this as a discrete probability distribution when it is continuous, and thus requires a density function.
@Ponderable
For some reason we cant hide multiline text with "returns".
Anyhow, your answer is in the ball park. I'm having trouble visualizing how you have arrived to determine where the discrepancy may lie.
It sounds like you are doing some type of numerical approximation ( Riemann Sum ) where the smallest unit of time is 1 minute. If that is the case, I suppose ...[text shortened]... e lower or upper bound, what is the the other boundary and justification for the boundary magnitude?
@ashiitaka saidCorrect! ( I think - its uber apparent your more adept in probability than myself )
This can be seen as the sum of two independent uniformly distributed random variables.
V1 ~ U(0,1)
V2 ~U(8,10)
sum distribution = 0 + (1-0)u1 + 8 + (10-8)u2.
You have to find where this distribution is less than 10.5:
8 + u1 + 2(u2) < 10.5
Which simplifies to (1/2)(u1) + u2 < 5/4
The area under the curve y = (-1/2)x + 5/4 within a square on the Cartesian plane bounded by the points (0,0); (0,1); (1,1) and (1,0) = 0.9375.
@joe-shmo saidShows there is usually more than 1 way to approach a problem.
Correct! ( I think - its uber apparent your more adept in probability than myself )
Since this is a uniform distribution:
I solved by making a plot of time asleep vs time awake. All possible outcomes are represented by the area a parallelogram with vertices ( 10,6 ), ( 10,8 ), (11,7), (11,9 )
This parallelogram has a base of 2 (hr) and a height of 1 (hr).
Waking ...[text shortened]...
P ( Waking > 8:30 ) = (1/2)^3 /2 = (1/2)^4
Finally:
P ( Waking < 8:30 ) = 1 - (1/2)^4 = 15/16
@venda saidMaybe if there's another lock down?
Shows there is usually more than 1 way to approach a problem.
I vow to spend time analysing the various problems to see how much I can understand!
Maybe if there's another lock down?