Newspaper puzzle

Newspaper puzzle

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
14 Mar 21

@venda

I wouldn't think this one can be solved logically, but Joe may show differently...

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
14 Mar 21
1 edit

@bigdoggproblem said
@venda

I wouldn't think this one can be solved logically, but Joe may show differently...
It can be solved analytically, but I don't believe exactly ( unless there is some number theory does the last step ). What I mean is that we can write a formula for the number of cards in an "n" story triangular card house, but we have to do a parameter search to find the solutions that exist with "n" as a natural number.

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
84013
15 Mar 21

@joe-shmo said
It can be solved analytically, but I don't believe exactly ( unless there is some number theory does the last step ). What I mean is that we can write a formula for the number of cards in an "n" story triangular card house, but we have to do a parameter search to find the solutions that exist with "n" as a natural number.
Been a bit busy with other stuff so I haven't looked at the problem again or your hidden answers yet.
Do you have the actual answer,or do I need to look in the paper to confirm?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
15 Mar 21

@venda said
Been a bit busy with other stuff so I haven't looked at the problem again or your hidden answers yet.
Do you have the actual answer,or do I need to look in the paper to confirm?
Answer is 5 decks

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
84013
15 Mar 21

That's right Joe
Well done

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
15 Mar 21
1 edit

Let "n" be the number of stories, and "c" be the number of cards to construct it. Let the cards used to form the side walls be "d", and floor above them be "f"

n = 1

/\

c = d = 2

n = 2

../\
..__
/\/\

c = 2*d + f +[ d ]

n = 3

../\
..__
./\/\
.__ __
/\/\/\

c = 3d + 2f + [ 2d + f + d ]

n= 4

c = 4d+3f + [3d + 2f + 2d + f + d ]

For a house of "n" stories

c = nd + (n-1)f + (n-1)d + (n-2)f + (n-2)d +...+ 2f + 2d + f + d

rearrange the terms grouping by type


c (n) = { 1 + 2 + ... + (n-2) + ( n-1 ) + n }d + { 1 + 2 + ... + (n-2) + ( n-1 ) }f

Sum of the first "n" natural numbers for the number of sidewall units:

1 + 2 + ... + (n-2) + ( n-1 ) + n = n *( n + 1 )/2


Sum of the first "n-1" natural numbers for the number of floor units:

1 + 2 + ... + (n-2) + ( n-1 ) = ( n-1 )* n /2

So :

c(n) = d* n * ( n + 1 )/2 + f* ( n-1 ) *n /2

where d = 2 and f = 1

this simplifies algebraically to:

c(n) = n*( 3*n+1 )/2

From here I just used the quadratic formula to solve for "n" sweeping through "k"

n*( 3*n+1 )/2 = 52*k

first( non-zero) solution:

n = 13 , k = 5

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
15 Mar 21

I guess my question to people better at number theory:

can we find the solutions for "k" from:

k = n*( 3n+1 )/104

the prime factorization of 104 = 2*2*2*13

The numerator has to be even to be evenly divisible by 104.

n = even → 3n+1 = odd
n= odd → 3n+1 = even

I never no where to go with this type of question!

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
84013
15 Mar 21

@joe-shmo said
I guess my question to people better at number theory:

can we find the solutions for "k" from:

k = n*( 3n+1 )/104

the prime factorization of 104 = 2*2*2*13

The numerator has to be even to be evenly divisible by 104.

n = even → 3n+1 = odd
n= odd → 3n+1 = even

I never no where to go with this type of question!
Thanks for the explanation Joe.
I'd have to do some serious revision to work out how to convert your final equation into the quadratic formula(I assume it's the x=minus b + or minus the square route of b squared etc).
Judging by your input to my questions I can't imagine many,if any on this site being better at number theory than your good self!

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
84013
03 Apr 21

I don't really understand this weeks puzzle,I'm not that familiar with pyramid geometry but I'm sure some of you will be able to solve it:-
A Faberge egg collection may only be displayed when arranged as triangular pyramids of 1,4,10,20,35 and so on.
700(as usual!!) eggs are on display.What is the smallest number of pyramids that can make up the display ?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
03 Apr 21
7 edits

@venda said
I don't really understand this weeks puzzle,I'm not that familiar with pyramid geometry but I'm sure some of you will be able to solve it:-
A Faberge egg collection may only be displayed when arranged as triangular pyramids of 1,4,10,20,35 and so on.
700(as usual!!) eggs are on display.What is the smallest number of pyramids that can make up the display ?
Hey venda, If you want to give it a go the author is telling you how many eggs are used to construct a triangular pyramid ( so we don't really have to know how to build them per se) .

There are triangular pyramids of 1 egg., 4 eggs, 10 eggs, 20 eggs, 35 eggs, etc... The puzzle is to figure out the pattern for the sequence above ( no geometry necessary ).

Hint:
Examine the relationship between the sequence above and the sum of the first n Natural Numbers...and then you are going to need a spreadsheet.


Answer:
2 pyramids minimum - 20 eggs, and 680 eggs


Another thing!
I think the author dropped the ball on this one, because you can also make 700 egg display with 7 pyramids! 20 + 35 + 56 + 84 + 120 + 165 + 220 = 700 Just have to come up with the right question to ask to suss it out!

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
84013
03 Apr 21

@joe-shmo said
Hey venda, If you want to give it a go the author is telling you how many eggs are used to construct a triangular pyramid ( so we don't really have to know how to build them per se) .

There are triangular pyramids of 1 egg., 4 eggs, 10 eggs, 20 eggs, 35 eggs, etc... The puzzle is to figure out the pattern for the sequence above ( no geometry necessary ).

Hint:
[hidd ...[text shortened]... 120 + 165 + 220 = 700 Just have to come up with the right question to ask to suss it out! [/hidden]
Re another thing-The question asks the smallest number of pyramids.
Your answer is correct.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
03 Apr 21

@venda said
Re another thing-The question asks the smallest number of pyramids.
Your answer is correct.
I wasn't saying they were wrong. I was just saying there is a possible answer involving 7 as well. You know, almost everything in the puzzles seemingly being tied to "7"

Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
84013
24 Apr 21
2 edits

This weeks puzzle should be good for all you mathematicians who are far more educated than me:-
An amplifier has 100 dials that go up to 11.Turning them past 11 returns them to zero.The first roadie turns every dial to 1.The second roadie turns dials 2,4,6 .... up by one.the third roadie turns dials 3.6.9....up by one and so on.After the hundredth roadie finishes which dials are on zero ? . Which dials would be on zero if they only went up to 10?
Can't imagine a band having a hundred roadies but there you go!!

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
24 Apr 21
2 edits

@venda said
This weeks puzzle should be good for all you mathematicians who are far more educated than me:-
An amplifier has 100 dials that go up to 11.Turning them past 11 returns them to zero.The first roadie turns every dial to 1.The second roadie turns dials 2,4,6 .... up by one.the third roadie turns dials 3.6.9....up by one and so on.After the hundredth roadie finishes which dial ...[text shortened]... o if they only went up to 10?
Can't imagine a band having a hundred roadies but there you go!!
Number theory...blahh.

For the 11 position knobs: 60,72,84,90,96 are on 0. They all have 12 factors, which means they will be turned 12 times, setting them to zero. Im not aware of methods for counting factors of numbers analytically, but I'm sure they exist. I cheated and used a table/list to find them! I'll let the last one for someone else.

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12473
24 Apr 21

@joe-shmo said
Im not aware of methods for counting factors of numbers analytically, but I'm sure they exist.
Lord, I hope not! That would, by implication, break the entire internet. All on-line security is mostly based on the fact that prime factors are hard to find.