Charles Russell, founder of JWs believed (and stated) that the divinity of Jesus was retained, and was one of the reasons he should be worshipped.
Our resident JW here won't touch this with a barge pole and has only tendered a weak watering down of the term 'worship' akin to the reverence a chap might give his postman for delivering a parcel.
Charles Russell presents a Jesus that is no longer recognised by current JWs, a Jesus that was divine and worthy of genuine worship. - I'm getting the feeling that modern day JWs are a little embarrassed by the beliefs of their founder and seek to distance themselves rather than admitting their views have changed (and moved further away from scripture).
Our resident JW here won't touch this with a barge pole and has only tendered a weak watering down of the term 'worship' akin to the reverence a chap might give his postman for delivering a parcel.
Charles Russell presents a Jesus that is no longer recognised by current JWs, a Jesus that was divine and worthy of genuine worship. - I'm getting the feeling that modern day JWs are a little embarrassed by the beliefs of their founder and seek to distance themselves rather than admitting their views have changed (and moved further away from scripture).