Originally posted by atticus2
One possible solution might be to re-align late entrants like me by placing them on entry, say, 30 places below their graded position. Otherwise, it's pretty pointless for any high-graded players to join the ladders if they didn't at the start. An alternative would be to band the ladder into 'divisions', allowing up & down movement of individuals, but feedi ...[text shortened]... new entrants into the bottom of the relevant division, not the bottom of the entire ladder.
I think your first suggestion is a bit tricky. Right now the ladders are still based on rating, but when challenges are won and lost, people with a lower rating could end up relatively high on the ladder (because they might put very much effort in thier ladder games or whatever), and vice versa. So if your rating is 1200 and you should be placed somewhere in the ladder there is no actual 1200 position because all the ratings are mixed up.
I do like your second suggestion: "
An alternative would be to band the ladder into 'divisions', allowing up & down movement of individuals, but feeding new entrants into the bottom of the relevant division, not the bottom of the entire ladder."
And (, orion25,) I also think this would be pretty fair to lower rated players since they would be placed in thier own playing strength division. They too should have the right to move up the rankings, but lets just face the facts; a 1200 player is never, ever going to make it to position 1.
The only 'problem' i see for this suggestion is that, when someone new to the ladder would be placed at the bottom of a higher division, he/she should get a rank/position. This would mean all the players below that division position would lose 1 rank without finishing any games.