27 Mar '24 09:56>1 edit
@averagejoe1 said" That phrase is used when a panel, a judge, or a jury ‘finds’ someone to be innocent."
Hillary was “found innocent of”? That phrase is used when a panel, a judge, or a jury ‘finds’ someone to be innocent. A single appointed govt officer has no such power.
So, she still must face a jury, at least. Will they find she is NOT guilty of destroying evidence or obstruction , or the server, or destroying govt property? I don’t mean to be funny, but what if H ...[text shortened]... having a torrid affair with Comey? He ‘found her’ innocent.
You fellers live in a sea of crap.
You are right. I misspoke., She was already innocent. She didn't get before a judge jury or panel so she remained innocent.
I should have said "no evidence of her being guilty of anything was found".
Good catch
"So, she still must face a jury, at least."
For what crime. You think she is so powerful that during Trump presidency there wouldn't have been a prosecuter and a judge willing to have her stand trial if there was any shred of evidence? That several republican committees failed to find?
How are you not getting dizzy? I mean you keep climbing the ladder of stupidity, do you even see the ground anymore? Is there still oxygen at that altitude?
"I don’t mean to be funny, but what if Hillary were having a torrid affair with Comey? He ‘found her’ innocent."
You can't help it. You're stupid in a very hilarious manner