1. SubscriberWajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    Provocation
    Joined
    01 Sep '04
    Moves
    78061
    03 Jul '15 07:03
    Originally posted by finnegan
    The purpose is not to avoid fraudulent transfer. It is to avoid legal transfers designed to legally avoid tax, primarily inheritance taxes. Gifts to children sound sweet but, for the very wealthy, and the only people likely to experience these types of taxation, this is about the intolerable scale of inherited wealth and privilege, which ensures that the ...[text shortened]... omy needs more wealthy kids enjoying a priviliged life on the back of their family trust?

    . .
    " for the very wealthy, and the only people likely to experience these types of taxation,"

    ...and people who realize that as long as the wealth has not been acquired by force, threats of force and fraud you have no claim on it and it's none of your business.
  2. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    03 Jul '15 14:381 edit
    Originally posted by Wajoma
    " for the very wealthy, and the only people likely to experience these types of taxation,"

    ...and people who realize that as long as the wealth has not been acquired by force, threats of force and fraud you have no claim on it and it's none of your business.
    Money is taxed whenever it changes hands in the stream of commerce. I don't see a moral difference between that and changing hands via a gift. Is it more moral to tax a transfer of wealth because it was done in exchange for a service than if it was done as a gift?

    I'd love for someone to explain the logic behind that distinction.
  3. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    03 Jul '15 14:39
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Amen.
    I actually wasn't completely sold on that position until you convinced me a couple of years back. 😉
  4. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    04 Jul '15 06:56
    Originally posted by sh76
    Money is taxed whenever it changes hands in the stream of commerce. I don't see a moral difference between that and changing hands via a gift. Is it more moral to tax a transfer of wealth because it was done in exchange for a service than if it was done as a gift?

    I'd love for someone to explain the logic behind that distinction.
    Well, the logic is that taxation is bad, so we shouldn't do it. But we still need someone to pay for our government, so we just have to wait for the fairy queen to provide tax dollars.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree