24 Mar '15 17:14>
Originally posted by vivifyThere are differences between inadvertent mistakes and boldfaced lies. For example Dan Rather insisted for months his report on Presidential candidate George W. Bush was accurate, until the "evidence" was exposed as a document produced with a dot matrix printer which didn't exist at the time the document was purported to have been produced by and IBM electric typewriter.
Let's start with an incredibly in-your-face lie from Sean Hannity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h172eAPdPFo
^
That alone is more than enough. But here's more from Bill O'Reilly:
Lies about JFK's assassin:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2976495/CNN-publishes-audio-Bill-O-Reilly-proving-lied-Killing-Kennedy.html
Lies about war covera ...[text shortened]... .com/politics/bill-oreilly-long-list-of-lies/
Had enough? Will you admit you were wrong?
I went through most of your stuff, and much of it is disputable, and arguable, or simply misread stuff. In addition to Jon Stewart, your bastions of truth are Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman, both of whom MSNBC had to sack for their ventures out of reality.
As I said before, viewers have plenty of choices, and despite all of the efforts to discredit Fox News, it leads all others in the ratings, that is more people voluntarily choose that channel over the others. All those people are not clones, or stupid, nor do they not choose to watch the others to get perspective.