14 Nov '14 06:23>1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyYes. I disagreed with his motives (Oil) and his reluctance to remove Mugabe.
So you supported Bush removing Saddam?
Originally posted by twhiteheadSo what defines a dictator? Is it someone who does not hold elections?
I agree. I don't necessarily think it is wise to topple dictators, but I do think it is morally acceptable. Unfortunately the US has a history of installing more dictators than they have toppled. In fact, some of the ones they toppled, were ones they had installed.
Originally posted by no1marauderWe'll see whether he does a unilateral ousting and whether it is ruled by official (constitutional) means that the office is faithfully executed by that event. Until then it is a matter of conjecture. Faithful execution of office and defense of the constitution are the stated interests.
He took no such oath. Here's the oath he did take:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Nothing in the Constitution is consistent with the President unilaterally deciding to oust another country's leader.