- Joined
- 09 Sep 10
- Moves
- 2501
44d
The funny part is companies said less employees and more robots or do it yourself atmosphere would lower prices but No No No!!
All that jumbo mumbo talk ended with higher prices based mostly on corporate greed.
I'll pat the back of those Americans who just go in and take what they want. I respect those poor people.
A limit on profit is needed in law.
44d
@averagejoe1 saidTell your corporate buddies thanks, for all of us. Thanks for nothing.
Just great. I would just go to the grocery store and make my own 'fast food' , but it is more expensive than is the fast food businesses prices.
Oh dear, oh dear, what to do? I am Eeeyore.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/san-diego-fast-food-minimum-wage/3475150/
Fewer employees to pay, more money from the consumer.
Win/win for them; not so much for consumers.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 10
- Moves
- 2501
44d
@AverageJoe1
You better not be a wealthy bastard believe you me.
Don't make me focus on your stink eye. 🤨
43d
@shavixmir saidRight? Like where did this come from: "A limit on profit is needed in law"?
Well, unless he’s being sarcastic, surely that’s left-wing viewpoints he’s suggesting?
43d
@fartacus saidUhoh. Limit on profit. Are there no common sense patriots left on the forum?
The funny part is companies said less employees and more robots or do it yourself atmosphere would lower prices but No No No!!
All that jumbo mumbo talk ended with higher prices based mostly on corporate greed.
I'll pat the back of those Americans who just go in and take what they want. I respect those poor people.
A limit on profit is needed in law.
43d
@suzianne saidSerious question, you will not answer.
Tell your corporate buddies thanks, for all of us. Thanks for nothing.
Fewer employees to pay, more money from the consumer.
Win/win for them; not so much for consumers.
Do the corporate buddies of whom you speak have a duty to us, the consumers?
Oh, and how do you justify reducing their profits, as they work for their shareholders. Your investments include some of these corporations.
You will not answer.
43d
@averagejoe1 saidShareholders should be shot. Fukking parasites.
Serious question, you will not answer.
Do the corporate buddies of whom you speak have a duty to us, the consumers?
Oh, and how do you justify reducing their profits, as they work for their shareholders. Your investments include some of these corporations.
You will not answer.
43d
@shavixmir saidPoint of order. Shareholders have skin in the game, little feller. I doubt that you as a 20/hr work-week guy would dally in corporate ownership. If Sue and Kev, who have your demeanor, have pension plans, they own part of corporations. They have skin in the game, if you have never heard that phrase.
Shareholders should be shot. Fukking parasites.
Parasites.........no skin in the game. Just latches on and starts sucking.
You libs are slipping a bit as we get closer to November. Ha, even Sonhouo\se has fallen back on re-tweeting his old posts.
43d
@averagejoe1 saidShareholders. I would shoot every last fukking one of them. Parasites.
Point of order. Shareholders have skin in the game, little feller. I doubt that you as a 20/hr work-week guy would dally in corporate ownership. If Sue and Kev, who have your demeanor, have pension plans, they own part of corporations. They have skin in the game, if you have never heard that phrase.
Parasites.........no skin in the game. Just latches on and sta ...[text shortened]... bit as we get closer to November. Ha, even Sonhouo\se has fallen back on re-tweeting his old posts.
43d
1 edit
@shavixmir saidParasites??? That is a misstatement, meant to mislead many of our fans. Careful, you may knock yourself off the most revered first place amongst trusted posters.
Shareholders. I would shoot every last fukking one of them. Parasites.
Your disdain for shareholders evidences your obvious hatred for the rich. Why, how, does their richness have anything to do with you? I never have gotten that about you libs, always looking over the fence. And, probably someone ELSE's fence.