Cenerentola blunders a rook!!

Cenerentola blunders a rook!!

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Senecio Jacobaea

Yorkshire

Joined
04 Jul 09
Moves
186567
22 Jun 16

There can be many reasons for a blunder: inattention, fixations, mouse slip, sticky touch screens but this one? Wrong rook five perhaps?

Following my poor play with a Centre Counter Defence Andersson variation we arrive at the following position. Black has a weak kingside, doubled pawns, a vulnerable bishop and an undeveloped rook. One would think a swift kick at any of these weaknesses would bring about quick victory, however...

State of Confusion

Lancashire

Joined
04 May 08
Moves
842388
22 Jun 16

Stockfish wants to play Rh5 in that position.
Ra5 blunders a rook!!
Just moved the rook the wrong way.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
22 Jun 16

Originally posted by Ragwort
There can be many reasons for a blunder: inattention, fixations, mouse slip, sticky touch screens but this one? Wrong rook five perhaps?

Following my poor play with a Centre Counter Defence Andersson variation we arrive at the following position. Black has a weak kingside, doubled pawns, a vulnerable bishop and an undeveloped rook. One would think a swift ...[text shortened]... P/2K1R3 w - - 4 15"]
1. Ra5 Qxa5 {Yum} 2. Qd2 Rad8 {Here's my extra rook! White resigns} [/pgn]
If you take with the knight he can fork your queen and bishop on d5 to get his knight onto an awkward square as he gets the bishop with check. So maybe he was trying to sac the exchange and forgot your queen could take (or at least that the knight fork after the capture doesn't work).

Joined
12 Nov 06
Moves
74414
22 Jun 16

I bet he had the board flipped when he had the position on his computer. "OK, it says rook all the way to the left" So that's what he played. Probably didn't even notice the mistake until the next time he input the position.

The drunk knight

Stuck on g1

Joined
02 Sep 12
Moves
59233
22 Jun 16

Would a real chess player at his "level" ever make this kind of mistake?

I've played when drunk sometimes, but still know the difference between a-file and h-file!

Chess Librarian

The Stacks

Joined
21 Aug 09
Moves
113589
22 Jun 16

Originally posted by 64squaresofpain
Would a real chess player at his "level" ever make this kind of mistake?

I've played when drunk sometimes, but still know the difference between a-file and h-file!
It happens. I remember when Karpov once hung a piece to Christiansen in the opening and thinking "Wow, it happens to all of us."

I recently had a game where I recaptured with the wrong piece without even realizing it and hung my queen. My opponent, who was seeing the same things I was seeing, missed my mistake and resigned! Stuff happens.

The drunk knight

Stuck on g1

Joined
02 Sep 12
Moves
59233
23 Jun 16

Originally posted by Paul Leggett
It happens. I remember when Karpov once hung a piece to Christiansen in the opening and thinking "Wow, it happens to all of us."

I recently had a game where I recaptured with the wrong piece without even realizing it and hung my queen. My opponent, who was seeing the same things I was seeing, missed my mistake and resigned! Stuff happens.
Leaving pieces hanging, sure, but confusing Ra5 with Rh5??
In the context of the game, they're not even in the same area code!

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
23 Jun 16

Originally posted by Ragwort
There can be many reasons for a blunder: inattention, fixations, mouse slip, sticky touch screens but this one? Wrong rook five perhaps?

Following my poor play with a Centre Counter Defence Andersson variation we arrive at the following position. Black has a weak kingside, doubled pawns, a vulnerable bishop and an undeveloped rook. One would think a swift ...[text shortened]... P/2K1R3 w - - 4 15"]
1. Ra5 Qxa5 {Yum} 2. Qd2 Rad8 {Here's my extra rook! White resigns} [/pgn]
Nice. Way to show him up.

Ra5 is a move that can only be made by a person who has no clue whatsoever how to play a decent game of chess.

Even most engine cheats would realize the machine could not possibly be suggesting such a move, because they usually have some playing ability; just not as much as they'd like.

But this loser barely knows the moves.

He deserves every ounce of scorn he gets for it!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
23 Jun 16

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
Nice. Way to show him up.

Ra5 is a move that can only be made by a person who has no clue whatsoever how to play a decent game of chess.

Even most engine cheats would realize the machine could not possibly be suggesting such a move, because they usually have some playing ability; just not as much as they'd like.

But this loser barely knows the moves.

He deserves every ounce of scorn he gets for it!
I'm on his do not call list. I wonder how many other folks are banned from PMing him also?

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
24 Jun 16
1 edit

Originally posted by sonhouse
I'm on his do not call list. I wonder how many other folks are banned from PMing him also?
That question loses much of its interest if one does a quick search on his forum posts.

Edit: or it would have, if the &#($(! mods hadn't deleted them all. Thanks, mods. Some of us prefer advanced warning when encountering lunatics! 😠

Joined
21 Aug 15
Moves
928
24 Jun 16

His blunder could have been much worse: 1. Rd8, which allows 4 pieces to take it instead of 2. Give him some credit.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
25 Jun 16
1 edit

Originally posted by Ragwort
There can be many reasons for a blunder: inattention, fixations, mouse slip, sticky touch screens but this one? Wrong rook five perhaps?

Following my poor play with a Centre Counter Defence Andersson variation we arrive at the following position. Black has a weak kingside, doubled pawns, a vulnerable bishop and an undeveloped rook. One would think a swift ...[text shortened]... P/2K1R3 w - - 4 15"]
1. Ra5 Qxa5 {Yum} 2. Qd2 Rad8 {Here's my extra rook! White resigns} [/pgn]
Wouldn't white still have an attack with Q-h6 followed by rook luft over to that side with R-e4 and R-g4 or h4? The knight would protect against black Q-g5+ forcing queen swap.

Mozart

liverpool

Joined
24 May 12
Moves
30766
25 Jun 16

Originally posted by Ragwort
There can be many reasons for a blunder: inattention, fixations, mouse slip, sticky touch screens but this one? Wrong rook five perhaps?

Following my poor play with a Centre Counter Defence Andersson variation we arrive at the following position. Black has a weak kingside, doubled pawns, a vulnerable bishop and an undeveloped rook. One would think a swift ...[text shortened]... P/2K1R3 w - - 4 15"]
1. Ra5 Qxa5 {Yum} 2. Qd2 Rad8 {Here's my extra rook! White resigns} [/pgn]
He was on Twelve losses for a very long time and all of a sudden,he has lost six times in last couple of months. I noticed one of his lost games recently were he hung his queen. Does anyone thing he is losing on purpose to take the pressure off his super human rating?

Chess Librarian

The Stacks

Joined
21 Aug 09
Moves
113589
25 Jun 16

Originally posted by Steve45
He was on Twelve losses for a very long time and all of a sudden,he has lost six times in last couple of months. I noticed one of his lost games recently were he hung his queen. Does anyone thing he is losing on purpose to take the pressure off his super human rating?
He could just as easily offer draws with less fanfare and drama. Speculating evil motives from such data is a reach, and does justice to no one.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
26 Jun 16

Originally posted by Paul Leggett
He could just as easily offer draws with less fanfare and drama. Speculating evil motives from such data is a reach, and does justice to no one.
It's more likely he just turned off the engine for a few days and was playing like he would OTB.