06 Jan '05 15:44>
Originally posted by AThousandYoungI take it you never played 'Day Of The Tentacle'?
EDIT - svin, what the [heck] is that thing in your picture?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_the_Tentacle
Originally posted by ExyNo, and that's NOT what I'm saying, that's NOT the point I'm making.
Do you think that all GMs have instinctively come to know the game as well as they do without tuition, without studying databases of past games, without immersing themselves totally in the history of the game?
Originally posted by ChessMomSorry, I did mean to suggest you missed the point. However, in actuality when can a book or database ever really tell you exactly what the best move in any given position will be unless you're still playing through a known book opening?
No, and that's NOT what I'm saying, that's NOT the point I'm making.
I'm talking about using the books and databases DURING AN ACTUAL GAME.
Of course, I *know* that everybody studies books and databases, I'm not stupid. I st ...[text shortened]... the test, the Pop Quiz, of whether you know how to play or not.
Originally posted by ChessMomDifferent rules apply to correspondence chess. GMs most certainly do use books and databases while playing by correspondence.
No, and that's NOT what I'm saying, that's NOT the point I'm making.
I'm talking about using the books and databases DURING AN ACTUAL GAME.
Of course, I *know* that everybody studies books and databases, I'm not stupid. I study books myself.
But.
I'm not talking about "tuition" and "studying" before and after games--I'm talkin ...[text shortened]... or you don't, and the game is the test, the Pop Quiz, of whether you know how to play or not.
Originally posted by ChessMomI think you're missing the whole point.
No, and that's NOT what I'm saying, that's NOT the point I'm making.
I'm talking about using the books and databases DURING AN ACTUAL GAME.
Of course, I *know* that everybody studies books and databases, I'm not stupid. I study books myself.
But.
I'm not talking about "tuition" and "studying" before and after games--I'm talkin ...[text shortened]... or you don't, and the game is the test, the Pop Quiz, of whether you know how to play or not.
Originally posted by ExyWell.
(b) You will not use chess software, chess computers or consult any third party to assist you in any game (unless expressly agreed prior to any game). Chess books and databases can be consulted during play.
Originally posted by ChessMomI guess Correspondence Chess isn't for you then, cos they're the rules on every CC website.
Well.
Color me surprised, then.
And a little bit disappointed. 🙁 I hadn't realized that apparently, everyone playing games on RHP is using books and databases to tell them what the good moves would be. So, all those games I've b ...[text shortened]... ou* alone. Mano a mano.
Well. Different strokes, I guess.
Originally posted by ChessMomWell, I guess this site's not for you then - I did wonder why you've not actually made a move since you signed up back in March last year - well now I know. 😏
I guess I'm a purist, and to me, if you get any kind of help, to me, that invalidates your whole game, whether you win or not. I don't want to play chess with "you plus Capablanca", or "you plus the Fritz database", or "you plus your Uncle John who is sitting at the kitchen table giving you advice"--I want to play chess with *you* alone. Mano a mano.
Originally posted by ChessMomI don't think the majority makes much use of books/databases.Not on rhp.This site is a special animal,one of a kind,IMO.For instance,where else can you see players compete for the most moves?Only on rhp,as far as I know.
Well.
Color me surprised, then.
And a little bit disappointed. 🙁 I hadn't realized that apparently, everyone playing games on RHP is using books and databases to tell them what the good moves would be. So, all those games I've been studying here, that people are linking to, are the results of two people playing chess, not on their own "tick", b ...[text shortened]... --I want to play chess with *you* alone. Mano a mano.
Well. Different strokes, I guess.
Originally posted by ChessMomNot everyone on RHP uses books and databases. But it's a fact that all the higher rated players (1500+) do. I made this exact same point in the "is this cheating" thread, a person there admitted to playing the first 19 (at the very least, he didn't say how many after that) moves of his game purely thorugh looking it up in databases and online, to see how GMs played in that position.
I hadn't realized that apparently, everyone playing games on RHP is using books and databases to tell them what the good moves would be. So, then, to me, the ratings are even more meaningless, being only a measure of "how well a person can play chess with suggestions ready to hand", rather than "How well a person can play chess", period.
To me, the ...[text shortened]... complex a game chess is, so therefore a book or database can't help you win" is meaningless.
Originally posted by ExyYour example is more than a little flawed - in your analogy, a textbook/class notes would be equivalent to a database, and an engine would be equivalent to a calculator. And I recall when I took my tests, we were not allowed to take your textbooks or notes. The reson calculators are used is because it's not humanly possible to calculate sin, cos, tan, logorithms, etc in your head.
For a long while now students have been allowed to take calculators into their maths exams - do you anti-databasers disapprove of this too?! 😉
An opening database book simply sets the maths problem, you've still got you use your brain to solve it.