03 Aug 16
Originally posted by Metal BrainIn other words, commission another study, maybe lasting 50 years till it's too late and Florida is underwater.
"Show me the vast minority who DON'T agree, climatologists not geneticists or astronomers or computer scientists."
No poll exists to show climatologists believe man is the "primary cause". I cannot show you a poll that does not exist. Prove your positive instead of expecting me to prove a negative. You are being very unreasonable as usual.
Originally posted by Metal BrainHere is more poles this time not from skepticalscience but wiki:
No poll exists to show climatologists believe man is the "primary cause". .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change
"...Several surveys have been conducted of the opinions of scientists on anthropogenic climate change. They have generally concluded that the majority of scientists accept that human activity is contributing to global warming.
...
97–98% of the most published climate researchers say humans are very likely causing most global warming.[17] In another study 97.4% of publishing specialists in climate change say that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures.
..."
it then goes on to show SEVERAL such poles that show the opposite of what you claim; as usual, yet again you are the liar here.
There, sorted.
Originally posted by humyDon't worry, he will try to negate that one also.
Here is more poles this time not from skepticalscience but wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change
"...Several surveys have been conducted of the opinions of scientists on anthropogenic climate change. They have generally concluded that the majority of scientists accept that human activity is contributing to glob ...[text shortened]... ow the opposite of what you claim; as usual, yet again you are the liar here.
There, sorted.
Originally posted by humyYou are stupid. Note that it says scientists and not climate scientists. You have stated before that a nobel winning scientist that was very skeptical of MMGW was not qualified to have his opinion taken seriously because he is not a climate scientist and now you are doing the same thing with blatant hypocrisy.
Here is more poles this time not from skepticalscience but wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change
"...Several surveys have been conducted of the opinions of scientists on anthropogenic climate change. They have generally concluded that the majority of scientists accept that human activity is contributing to glob ...[text shortened]... ow the opposite of what you claim; as usual, yet again you are the liar here.
There, sorted.
Originally posted by sonhouseOf course. You idiots are using the same wiki link that Kazetnaggora tried to use citing the opinion of weathermen and other people who are not climate scientists.
Don't worry, he will try to negate that one also.
You both have embarrassed yourselves really good this time....lol!
Originally posted by Metal BrainLaugh while you can, but don't buy land on the coast of Florida. Unless you want to put your money where your mouth is.
Of course. You idiots are using the same wiki link that Kazetnaggora tried to use citing the opinion of weathermen and other people who are not climate scientists.
You both have embarrassed yourselves really good this time....lol!
Originally posted by Metal BrainSome of the poles I showed are specifically for climate scientists.
[b]Note that it says scientists and not climate scientists. b]
Just one example from the wiki link;
"Bray and von Storch, 2008..
Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, of the Institute for Coastal Research at the Helmholtz Research Centre in Germany, conducted an online survey in August 2008, of 2,059 climate scientists from 34 different countries,..."
As shown by the links I provided, all the many published poles that so far I have seen show that both the majority of scientists and, contrary to your claim and proving you a liar, the vast majority of climate scientists in particular, agree that global warming is real and the primary cause is man.
The fact that it is the poles specifically with climate scientists and not the ones with scientists in general that really count does nothing to diminish the fact that the poles specifically with climate scientists proves you a liar.
And every time you just moronically repeat your usual false claim that the majority of climate scientist agree with you and say global warming is not man made, all I will do is show the same poles again to remind other readers here of the proof that you are a liar (not that there would be many here that need convincing! That is one of the many things you are too stupid to get).
Originally posted by humyWe're all gonna die! 😲
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-april-12th-month-row-global.html
Locally, in my part of the world, it has been a very late spring and so cold that I still have to put the central heating on and I really wish for some warm weather. Meanwhile, globally, the overall temperature is still going up to ever greater heights. I guess I will get far more than what I wish ...[text shortened]... ill still say this isn't evidence of global warming. No amount of evidence is evidence for them.
No, seriously.
Originally posted by humyNot primary cause. You are the liar.
Some of the poles I showed are specifically for climate scientists.
Just one example from the wiki link;
"Bray and von Storch, 2008..
Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, of the Institute for Coastal Research at the Helmholtz Research Centre in Germany, conducted an online survey in August 2008, of 2,059 [b]climate scientists from 34 different countries,. ...[text shortened]... any here that need convincing! That is one of the many things you are too stupid to get).[/b]