14 Jan '24 02:55>
Why don't Christians believe that the renowned NT scholar Bart D. Ehrman is divinely inspired?
@fmf saidI’d never heard of him; probably most Christians haven’t. However having had a quick read up on him I’d say that Biblical literalists such as KellyJay, Josephw and millions of others would argue that as he has written 30 odd books examining and questioning the authenticity of the renowned collection of ancient texts called “The Holy Bible” … that he is inspired by Satan.
Why don't Christians believe that the renowned NT scholar Bart D. Ehrman is divinely inspired?
@fmf saidI don't know the man, only took a cursory look at one video, but I think "divinely inspired", in this day and age, is a useless term, and the odds are, and I do not believe I'm going too far out on a limb here when I say, that he is not.
Why don't Christians believe that the renowned NT scholar Bart D. Ehrman is divinely inspired?
@divegeester saidI believe they call this "damning with faint praise".
I’d never heard of him; probably most Christians haven’t. However having had a quick read up on him I’d say that Biblical literalists such as KellyJay, Josephw and millions of others would argue that as he has written 30 odd books examining and questioning the authenticity of the renowned collection of ancient texts called “The Holy Bible” … that he is inspired by Satan. ...[text shortened]... opic
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/attributes-of-god.195809/page-10#post_4617123
@suzianne saidIf Ehrman has made it possible for people to get closer to knowing the truth about the provenance, textual integrity, and internal logic of the New Testament, doesn't that mean his work ~ according to those who believe that the scriptures and their subsequent translations are divinely inspired ~ is part of the process?
A greater question is why are you taking up the idea that he is?