03 Jul '14 08:41>
Originally posted by RJHindsNo offense, but you have no idea how much that explains.
Yes I did listen to his nonsense, but was unable to make sense of it.
Originally posted by C HessListened to it, not sure what you think. For me it was just someone
...beautifully stomped on.
Ken Ham: A Thousand Lies To Defend A "Truth": http://youtu.be/ce_CWxdxrC4
What do you think, RJHinds?
Originally posted by C HessI don't understand what you want me to explain. I do not know Ken Ham or all his teachings enough to explain his speculations, and I know nothing about this commentator other than how arrogant he seems to present himself.
No offense, but you have no idea how much that explains.
Originally posted by RJHindsLet's just follow up on this one point at a time.
The commentator does not seem to know that there was just one big continent on earth before it's dividing sometime after the worldwide flood. Even most evolution scientist agree that there was once one super continent, they just disagree on how long ago it was.
Originally posted by RJHindsQuoted from the video:
The commentator seems to think that since we don't have the original clay or stone tablets that have been signed and dated by Moses that nobody should believe that Moses had anything to do with writing Genesis
Of course none of this means that Moses did not write the Pentateuch in some pre Phoenician language which is lost and that the clear meaning of his words was then faithfully reproduced and then translated through the centuries.
But it does mean that no one on earth can make the claim that:
"The 66 books of the Bible are the written Word of God. The Bible is divinely inspired and inerrant throughout. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs"
Originally posted by RJHindsEven if you don't accept the dating of it (which raises whole new problems) the cambrian explosion, and fossil evidence in general support evolution. We've been through this a few months ago.
The commentator has a disagreement with Ken Ham on a couple definitions. This is not unusual between creationists and evolutions. The evolutionists are noted for changing definitions when it deals with evolution.
The commentator is correct that a lot of fossils have been collected, however, he is wrong in saying it supports evolution because most of it i ...[text shortened]... ution. The Cambrian explosion is just one example, if one remembers to discard the false dating.
Originally posted by RJHindsSo that's your explanation to the real problem he points out? In less than a few thousand
The commentator does not seem to know that there was just one big continent on earth before it's dividing sometime after the worldwide flood. Even most evolution scientist agree that there was once one super continent, they just disagree on how long ago it was.
Originally posted by C Hess1. The Holy bible says god tells Noah the following:
So that's your explanation to the real problem he points out? In less than a few thousand
years, all this happened:
1. There was a world-wide flood drowning all camel and llama-like creatures except two.
An event kindly documented by Moses.
2. The two remaining camel-llamas reproduced furiously, evolving within its kind into very
different k ...[text shortened]... ne at
all. No follow-ups. Nope. Can't think of a single question in response to that. Not one.
Originally posted by CalJustA point I remind you of no matter whose side you are speaking about both
Let's just follow up on this one point at a time.
A point where we all seem to agree is that there was once a super-continent, called Gondwanaland, that joined Africa, South America, India and Australia. Geologists and Paleontologists put it at about 180 to 450 million years ago, YECs at 3000 to 5000 BC (give or take). But let's leave the time there.
T ...[text shortened]... t climate and ecozones (or is it postulated that entire Gondwanaland was one unified ecosystem?)
Originally posted by C HessI take it the word faith is meaningless here? If it was a factual that we did
Quoted from the video:
Of course none of this means that Moses did not write the Pentateuch in some pre Phoenician language which is lost and that the clear meaning of his words was then faithfully reproduced and then translated through the centuries.
But it does mean that no one on earth can make the claim that:
"The 66 books of the Bible ar ...[text shortened]... d inerrant throughout. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs"
Originally posted by C HessThe fossils are just fossils they neither support or deny anything! When we
Even if you don't accept the dating of it (which raises whole new problems) the cambrian explosion, and fossil evidence in general support evolution. We've been through this a few months ago.
Originally posted by C HessThe answer is if there was a flood and all the animals came off, then they
So that's your explanation to the real problem he points out? In less than a few thousand
years, all this happened:
1. There was a world-wide flood drowning all camel and llama-like creatures except two.
An event kindly documented by Moses.
2. The two remaining camel-llamas reproduced furiously, evolving within its kind into very
different k ...[text shortened]... ne at
all. No follow-ups. Nope. Can't think of a single question in response to that. Not one.
Originally posted by C HessAfter the flood there is some beliefs that the land masses were one then
So that's your explanation to the real problem he points out? In less than a few thousand
years, all this happened:
1. There was a world-wide flood drowning all camel and llama-like creatures except two.
An event kindly documented by Moses.
2. The two remaining camel-llamas reproduced furiously, evolving within its kind into very
different k ...[text shortened]... ne at
all. No follow-ups. Nope. Can't think of a single question in response to that. Not one.
Originally posted by RJHindsThe video address this very issue. If Noah had not considered llamas and camels to be the
This must mean seven pairs of clean animals, and could also mean two pairs. I can not say for sure if all llama-like animals would be considered the same kind by Noah or not.