04 Mar 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYou write that infinity begins at the edge of the plate, but you use the idea to mean that infinity ends at the edge of the plate.
Bosse's suggestion notwithstanding...
If the universe were a plate, infinity begins at the edge of the plate. And, whatever is beyond said infinity, the One who holds the plate, created infinity, is beyond both.
Infinity by definition cannot end.
Quite simply, infinite is not like the edge of a plate.
04 Mar 06
Originally posted by telerionMonkey antics? Funny you should use such a perjorative term, considering the entire thread has been a concise and disciplined presentation of the attributes of God. Theology not being your cup of tea, I understand your disparage of the same.
OK, then I'll step back from your cage and just appreciate your silly monkey antics.
However, it seems your efforts would be better served in pointing out the weakness of the presentation (or, better, in the gaps of logic in the ideas themselves), than debasing your position with ineffectual similes.
04 Mar 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSimple.
Monkey antics? Funny you should use such a perjorative term, considering the entire thread has been a concise and disciplined presentation of the attributes of God. Theology not being your cup of tea, I understand your disparage of the same.
However, it seems your efforts would be better served in pointing out the weakness of the presentation (or, bett ...[text shortened]... he gaps of logic in the ideas themselves), than debasing your position with ineffectual similes.
Theology is not disciplined in any sense.
You and your silly monkey contradictions. 🙄
04 Mar 06
Originally posted by telerionCute. Don't be a Godaphobe. Read the attributes of God and point out to all, the inconsistencies, the gaps in logic.
Simple.
Theology is not disciplined in any sense.
You and your silly monkey contradictions. 🙄
Or, sit on the sidelines, throwing your fecal matter as the parade passes by.
04 Mar 06
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYou and I differ on the meaning of concise.
Monkey antics? Funny you should use such a perjorative term, considering the entire thread has been a concise and disciplined presentation of the attributes of God. Theology not being your cup of tea, I understand your disparage of the same.
However, it seems your efforts would be better served in pointing out the weakness of the presentation (or, bett ...[text shortened]... he gaps of logic in the ideas themselves), than debasing your position with ineffectual similes.
You sidestepped RWing's initial question. As your only source for the "attributes of god" is the bible and related exe/eisegesis from interested parties, doesn't this strike you as self-perpetuating mental masturbation? Why not bust out a copy of the Silmarillion and start in on Sauron?
04 Mar 06
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAt least that would make me a chimp. You're a monkey.
Cute. Don't be a Godaphobe. Read the attributes of God and point out to all, the inconsistencies, the gaps in logic.
Or, sit on the sidelines, throwing your fecal matter as the parade passes by.
Edit: Sadly, this sort of brutal honesty increases the quality of this thread.
04 Mar 06
Originally posted by David CYou and I differ on the meaning of concise.
That's possible. When I typed concise, here are the words that were rummaging around in my wee mind:
"adj.
Expressing much in few words; clear and succinct."
As I'm sure there are other, better definitions to which some may ascribe, I will defer to any corrections necessary.
doesn't this strike you as self-perpetuating mental masturbation?
Whatever you do in the privacy of your own bedroom as you read these posts is entirely between you and your parents.
Why not bust out a copy of the Silmarillion and start in on Sauron?
Probably a question of relevance, at least for me.